Independent information. England-wide.Public data. Clear sources.

NHS trusts · Kensington and Chelsea

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ

CQC: OutstandingActive source recordOrganisation information

What can I learn about The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust?

The recorded overall CQC rating is “Outstanding”, dated 16 January 2020. These figures describe an organisation or network; check which service and location would handle your care.

UNDERSTAND YOUR OPTIONS

Care and access: the published picture

Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.

Inpatient experience across this trust

Patients’ survey responses across the trust. These can include several hospital sites.

2025 survey NHS trust

Patients’ overall hospital experience

9.3 out of 10

9.3 out of 10 was reported for “Patients’ overall hospital experience”. Adult inpatients’ reported experience, scored out of 10 and adjusted by the publisher for age, sex and admission route. Higher scores mean more positive experiences; small differences do not establish a better hospital.

Definition and source

Published measure: Overall experience

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.88.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Being treated with respect and dignity

9.8 out of 10

9.8 out of 10 was reported for “Being treated with respect and dignity”. Adult inpatients’ reported experience of respect and dignity, scored out of 10. This describes the survey group and reporting unit shown, rather than every patient’s care.

Definition and source

Published measure: Respect and dignity

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.89.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?

8.9 out of 10

8.9 out of 10 was reported for “If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?

Reported sample: 416.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.68.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.2 out of 10
20249 out of 10
20258.9 out of 10
Explore 60 additional measures

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?

9 out of 10

9 out of 10 was reported for “Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?

Reported sample: 241.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.39 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 09.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20249.2 out of 10
20259 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.

8.1 out of 10

8.1 out of 10 was reported for “Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.

Reported sample: 296.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.47.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 08.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20248.1 out of 10
20258.1 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?

9.8 out of 10

9.8 out of 10 was reported for “During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?

Reported sample: 605.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 9.19.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.9 out of 10
20249.8 out of 10
20259.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?

9.3 out of 10

9.3 out of 10 was reported for “When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?

Reported sample: 611.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.39.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.5 out of 10
20249.4 out of 10
20259.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?

9.8 out of 10

9.8 out of 10 was reported for “Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?

Reported sample: 625.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.79.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.6 out of 10
20249.7 out of 10
20259.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?

9.6 out of 10

9.6 out of 10 was reported for “When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?

Reported sample: 619.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.49.2 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.6 out of 10
20249.4 out of 10
20259.6 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?

9.2 out of 10

9.2 out of 10 was reported for “When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?

Reported sample: 614.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.29.2 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.5 out of 10
20249.2 out of 10
20259.2 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?

9.6 out of 10

9.6 out of 10 was reported for “Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?

Reported sample: 624.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.69.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.4 out of 10
20249.4 out of 10
20259.6 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?

9.5 out of 10

9.5 out of 10 was reported for “When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?

Reported sample: 619.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.39.2 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.5 out of 10
20249.3 out of 10
20259.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?

9.4 out of 10

9.4 out of 10 was reported for “How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?

Reported sample: 477.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.27.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 09.4. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20249 out of 10
20259.4 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?

8.6 out of 10

8.6 out of 10 was reported for “In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?

Reported sample: 623.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 78.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.7 out of 10
20248.6 out of 10
20258.6 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?

8.7 out of 10

8.7 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?

Reported sample: 562.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.38.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.3 out of 10
20248.6 out of 10
20258.7 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?

8.1 out of 10

8.1 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?

Reported sample: 603.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.87.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.2 out of 10
20248.2 out of 10
20258.1 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?

9.6 out of 10

9.6 out of 10 was reported for “How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?

Reported sample: 618.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.69.2 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.7 out of 10
20249.6 out of 10
20259.6 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?

9 out of 10

9 out of 10 was reported for “Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?

Reported sample: 542.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.38.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.9 out of 10
20248.6 out of 10
20259 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?

9.7 out of 10

9.7 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?

Reported sample: 619.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 9.29.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.8 out of 10
20249.7 out of 10
20259.7 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?

9.3 out of 10

9.3 out of 10 was reported for “Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?

Reported sample: 546.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.49.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.4 out of 10
20249.6 out of 10
20259.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?

9.1 out of 10

9.1 out of 10 was reported for “Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?

Reported sample: 578.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.98.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239 out of 10
20249 out of 10
20259.1 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)

8.4 out of 10

8.4 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)

Reported sample: 83.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.710 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)

8.6 out of 10

8.6 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)

Reported sample: 77.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.79.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)

9.2 out of 10

9.2 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)

Reported sample: 70.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.69.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)

9.8 out of 10

9.8 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)

Reported sample: 133.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 89 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)

9.1 out of 10

9.1 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)

Reported sample: 169.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.28.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)

8.4 out of 10

8.4 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)

Reported sample: 108.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 57.6 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?

8.1 out of 10

8.1 out of 10 was reported for “Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?

Reported sample: 41.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.58.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 08.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20246.7 out of 10
20258.1 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?

8.2 out of 10

8.2 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?

Reported sample: 42.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.98.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 08.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20247.1 out of 10
20258.2 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?

7.8 out of 10

7.8 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?

Reported sample: 603.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.17.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 07.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.7 out of 10
20247.8 out of 10
20257.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?

7.2 out of 10

7.2 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?

Reported sample: 401.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.26.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?

9.7 out of 10

9.7 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?

Reported sample: 192.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.88.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.8 out of 10
20249.1 out of 10
20259.7 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?

8.3 out of 10

8.3 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?

Reported sample: 623.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.47.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.3. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.9 out of 10
20247.9 out of 10
20258.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.

9.4 out of 10

9.4 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.

Reported sample: 606.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.28.6 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.4 out of 10
20249.5 out of 10
20259.4 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?

9.3 out of 10

9.3 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?

Reported sample: 575.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.79.2 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.3. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.3 out of 10
20249.3 out of 10
20259.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?

7.7 out of 10

7.7 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?

Reported sample: 355.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.47.2 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?

6.3 out of 10

6.3 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?

Reported sample: 512.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 3.75.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 06.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20236.5 out of 10
20246 out of 10
20256.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.

9.2 out of 10

9.2 out of 10 was reported for “How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.

Reported sample: 501.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.28.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 09.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20249.1 out of 10
20259.2 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?

8.4 out of 10

8.4 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?

Reported sample: 587.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.17.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.4. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.3 out of 10
20248.3 out of 10
20258.4 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?

9.9 out of 10

9.9 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?

Reported sample: 606.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 78.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.6 out of 10
20249.6 out of 10
20259.9 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.

9.1 out of 10

9.1 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.

Reported sample: 280.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.28.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.9 out of 10
20248.6 out of 10
20259.1 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.

7.8 out of 10

7.8 out of 10 was reported for “After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.

Reported sample: 295.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.57.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 07.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20246.7 out of 10
20257.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?

9.8 out of 10

9.8 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?

Reported sample: 623.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.79.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.7 out of 10
20249.7 out of 10
20259.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?

9.8 out of 10

9.8 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?

Reported sample: 618.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.89.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.8 out of 10
20249.7 out of 10
20259.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.

9.3 out of 10

9.3 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.

Reported sample: 622.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.88.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.3. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.1 out of 10
20249.1 out of 10
20259.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?

8.5 out of 10

8.5 out of 10 was reported for “How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?

Reported sample: 618.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.87.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.7 out of 10
20248.7 out of 10
20258.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients

7.1 out of 10

7.1 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients

Reported sample: 617.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.67.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 07.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20236.2 out of 10
20247.1 out of 10
20257.1 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff

9.5 out of 10

9.5 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff

Reported sample: 617.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.99 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.8 out of 10
20248.8 out of 10
20259.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting

8.8 out of 10

8.8 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting

Reported sample: 617.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.98.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.2 out of 10
20248.5 out of 10
20258.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature

9 out of 10

9 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature

Reported sample: 617.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.69.6 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.1 out of 10
20249.1 out of 10
20259 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping

4.8 out of 10

4.8 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping

Reported sample: 617.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 34.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 04.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20233.8 out of 10
20243.9 out of 10
20254.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?

9.7 out of 10

9.7 out of 10 was reported for “How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?

Reported sample: 620.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.59.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.3 out of 10
20249.6 out of 10
20259.7 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?

9.2 out of 10

9.2 out of 10 was reported for “Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?

Reported sample: 445.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.58.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.6 out of 10
20248.8 out of 10
20259.2 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Admission to hospital

9 out of 10

9 out of 10 was reported for “Admission to hospital”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Admission to hospital

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.57.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Kindness and compassion

9.8 out of 10

9.8 out of 10 was reported for “Kindness and compassion”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Kindness and compassion

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.79.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

The hospital and ward

8.1 out of 10

8.1 out of 10 was reported for “The hospital and ward”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: The hospital and ward

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.18 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Basic needs

9 out of 10

9 out of 10 was reported for “Basic needs”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Basic needs

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.78.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Doctors

9.6 out of 10

9.6 out of 10 was reported for “Doctors”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Doctors

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.59.2 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Nurses

9.2 out of 10

9.2 out of 10 was reported for “Nurses”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Nurses

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.28.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Your care and treatment

9.1 out of 10

9.1 out of 10 was reported for “Your care and treatment”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Your care and treatment

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 88.6 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Individual needs

8.9 out of 10

8.9 out of 10 was reported for “Individual needs”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Individual needs

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 78.6 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Virtual wards

8.2 out of 10

8.2 out of 10 was reported for “Virtual wards”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Virtual wards

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.37.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Leaving hospital

8.4 out of 10

8.4 out of 10 was reported for “Leaving hospital”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Leaving hospital

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.67.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

For your decision Check whether a site-level survey is also available for the hospital you would attend.

Referral-to-treatment pathways

How long treatment pathways had already been waiting at the reporting date. One person can have more than one pathway.

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

93.3%

Total

93.3% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 1,719 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 1,719; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

1,719 waiting-list entries

Total

1,719 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

140 waiting-list entries

General Surgery Service

140 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

Explore 55 additional measures

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

67 waiting-list entries

Urology Service

67 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

110 waiting-list entries

Oral Surgery Service

110 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

45 waiting-list entries

Plastic Surgery Service

45 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

50 waiting-list entries

Gastroenterology Service

50 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

3 waiting-list entries

Dermatology Service

3 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Dermatology Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

2 waiting-list entries

Respiratory Medicine Service

2 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Respiratory Medicine Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

420 waiting-list entries

Other - Medical Services

420 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

20 waiting-list entries

Other - Paediatric Services

20 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

499 waiting-list entries

Other - Surgical Services

499 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

363 waiting-list entries

Other - Other Services

363 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

90.7%

General Surgery Service

90.7% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 140 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 140; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

95.5%

Urology Service

95.5% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 67 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 67; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

85.5%

Oral Surgery Service

85.5% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 110 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 110; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

75.6%

Plastic Surgery Service

75.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 45 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 45; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

90%

Gastroenterology Service

90% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 50 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 50; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

100%

Dermatology Service

100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Dermatology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

100%

Respiratory Medicine Service

100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 2 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Respiratory Medicine Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 2; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

96.7%

Other - Medical Services

96.7% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 420 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 420; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

100%

Other - Paediatric Services

100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 20 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 20; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

94%

Other - Surgical Services

94% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 499 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 499; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

93.4%

Other - Other Services

93.4% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 363 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 363; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

General Surgery Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 140 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 140; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Urology Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 67 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 67; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Oral Surgery Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 110 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 110; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Plastic Surgery Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 45 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 45; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Gastroenterology Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 50 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 50; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Dermatology Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Dermatology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Respiratory Medicine Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 2 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Respiratory Medicine Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 2; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Total

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 1,719 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 1,719; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Other - Medical Services

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 420 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 420; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Other - Paediatric Services

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 20 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 20; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Other - Surgical Services

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 499 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 499; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Other - Other Services

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 363 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 363; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways

44 pathways

General Surgery Service

44 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways

35 pathways

General Surgery Service

35 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Urology Service: completed admitted pathways

19 pathways

Urology Service

19 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Urology Service: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways

42 pathways

Urology Service

42 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Oral Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways

12 pathways

Oral Surgery Service

12 pathways was reported for “Oral Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Oral Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways

109 pathways

Oral Surgery Service

109 pathways was reported for “Oral Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Plastic Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways

19 pathways

Plastic Surgery Service

19 pathways was reported for “Plastic Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Plastic Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways

4 pathways

Plastic Surgery Service

4 pathways was reported for “Plastic Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways

36 pathways

Gastroenterology Service

36 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways

9 pathways

Gastroenterology Service

9 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Dermatology Service: completed non-admitted pathways

1 pathways

Dermatology Service

1 pathways was reported for “Dermatology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Dermatology Service: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Total: completed admitted pathways

641 pathways

Total

641 pathways was reported for “Total: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Total: completed non-admitted pathways

1,574 pathways

Total

1,574 pathways was reported for “Total: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Medical Services: completed admitted pathways

265 pathways

Other - Medical Services

265 pathways was reported for “Other - Medical Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Medical Services: completed non-admitted pathways

287 pathways

Other - Medical Services

287 pathways was reported for “Other - Medical Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Mental Health Services: completed non-admitted pathways

1 pathways

Other - Mental Health Services

1 pathways was reported for “Other - Mental Health Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Mental Health Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Paediatric Services: completed admitted pathways

12 pathways

Other - Paediatric Services

12 pathways was reported for “Other - Paediatric Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Paediatric Services: completed non-admitted pathways

6 pathways

Other - Paediatric Services

6 pathways was reported for “Other - Paediatric Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Surgical Services: completed admitted pathways

133 pathways

Other - Surgical Services

133 pathways was reported for “Other - Surgical Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways

650 pathways

Other - Surgical Services

650 pathways was reported for “Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways

101 pathways

Other - Other Services

101 pathways was reported for “Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways

430 pathways

Other - Other Services

430 pathways was reported for “Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

For your decision Ask which specialty and hospital site will handle your referral, and about your own expected wait.

Diagnostic tests and waiting lists

Historical diagnostic waiting lists and completed test activity describe different groups.

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

1 waiting-list entries

1 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: BARIUM_ENEMA: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

47 waiting-list entries

47 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

364 waiting-list entries

364 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: CT: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

Explore 30 additional measures

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

17 waiting-list entries

17 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

45 waiting-list entries

45 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

87 waiting-list entries

87 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

7 waiting-list entries

7 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

47 waiting-list entries

47 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

315 waiting-list entries

315 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRI: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

135 waiting-list entries

135 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

1,065 waiting-list entries

1,065 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: TOTAL: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

0%

0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: BARIUM_ENEMA: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

10.6%

10.6% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 47 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 47; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

0%

0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 364 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: CT: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 364; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

5.9%

5.9% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 17 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 17; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

0%

0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 45 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 45; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

0%

0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 87 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 87; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

0%

0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 7 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 7; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

17%

17% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 47 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 47; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

0%

0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 315 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRI: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 315; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

1.5%

1.5% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 135 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 135; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

1.5%

1.5% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 1,065 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: TOTAL: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 1,065; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

4 tests

4 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: BARIUM_ENEMA: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

84 tests

84 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

3,449 tests

3,449 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: CT: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

28 tests

28 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

101 tests

101 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

361 tests

361 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

28 tests

28 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

97 tests

97 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

2,023 tests

2,023 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRI: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

1,968 tests

1,968 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

8,143 tests

8,143 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: TOTAL: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

For your decision Confirm the test, referral route and site before comparing providers.

Cancer waiting-time standards

Published performance against specific cancer pathway standards, with separate patient groups.

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days

92%

92% was reported for “Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days

The calculation uses a denominator of 785; see the source for the eligible group.

July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.

Cancer waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat

97%

97% was reported for “Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat

The calculation uses a denominator of 968; see the source for the eligible group.

July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.

Cancer waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard

73%

73% was reported for “Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard

The calculation uses a denominator of 168.5; see the source for the eligible group.

July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.

Cancer waiting times · Coverage and method

For your decision Your clinical team can explain the next step and timescale for your own referral.

Hospital trends

Each measure retains its own reporting period. A&E reporting uses a changed footprint from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from our A&E trends.

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

A&E 12 hour performance

Not reported

There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.

Definition and source

Published measure: A&E 12 hour performance

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported. A&E footprint methodology changed from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from this comparison.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

A&E 4 hour performance

Not reported

There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.

Definition and source

Published measure: A&E 4 hour performance

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported. A&E footprint methodology changed from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from this comparison.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer 31 Day Treatment Standard

95.5%

95.5% was reported for “Cancer 31 Day Treatment Standard”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer 31 Day Treatment Standard

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0696.1%
2025-0796.4%
2025-0896.3%
2025-0996.8%
2025-1096.7%
2025-1194.7%
2025-1295.9%
2026-0195.2%
2026-0296.5%
2026-0396.3%
2026-0495.4%
2026-0596.7%
2026-0695.5%
Explore 5 additional measures

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer 62 Day Combined Performance

67.4%

67.4% was reported for “Cancer 62 Day Combined Performance”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer 62 Day Combined Performance

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0677.4%
2025-0768.6%
2025-0871.9%
2025-0972%
2025-1071.8%
2025-1167.8%
2025-1266.1%
2026-0171.9%
2026-0271.4%
2026-0375.7%
2026-0477.8%
2026-0571.9%
2026-0667.4%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer Faster Diagnostic Standard

90%

90% was reported for “Cancer Faster Diagnostic Standard”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer Faster Diagnostic Standard

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0689.2%
2025-0790.2%
2025-0888.2%
2025-0987.3%
2025-1088.5%
2025-1189.9%
2025-1288.9%
2026-0189.8%
2026-0291.9%
2026-0393.5%
2026-0490.3%
2026-0591.2%
2026-0690%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Diagnostics proportion waiting over 6 weeks

2.5%

2.5% was reported for “Diagnostics proportion waiting over 6 weeks”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Diagnostics proportion waiting over 6 weeks

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061.6%
2025-072%
2025-080.5%
2025-090.2%
2025-101%
2025-112%
2025-121.9%
2026-011.6%
2026-021%
2026-031.2%
2026-041.4%
2026-052.2%
2026-062.5%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Percentage waiting more than 52 weeks for elective treatment

0%

0% was reported for “Percentage waiting more than 52 weeks for elective treatment”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Percentage waiting more than 52 weeks for elective treatment

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-060.3%
2025-070.1%
2025-080.1%
2025-090.1%
2025-100.1%
2025-110.1%
2025-120.2%
2026-010.1%
2026-020.1%
2026-030.1%
2026-040%
2026-050%
2026-060%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Percentage waiting within 18 weeks for elective treatment

94.1%

94.1% was reported for “Percentage waiting within 18 weeks for elective treatment”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Percentage waiting within 18 weeks for elective treatment

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0694.5%
2025-0795.6%
2025-0894.8%
2025-0994%
2025-1095.5%
2025-1195.2%
2025-1294.4%
2026-0194.1%
2026-0294.4%
2026-0394.7%
2026-0494.8%
2026-0594.7%
2026-0694.1%

Hospital and community workforce

Reported staff capacity across the organisation and its services.

June 2026 reporting organisation

All staff groups: Full-time equivalent

4,546.7 FTE

4,546.7 FTE was reported for “All staff groups: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: All staff groups: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 04,661.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-064,568.1 FTE
2025-074,560.1 FTE
2025-084,553.5 FTE
2025-094,616.7 FTE
2025-104,624.4 FTE
2025-114,636 FTE
2025-124,628.3 FTE
2026-014,650.2 FTE
2026-024,649.3 FTE
2026-034,661.4 FTE
2026-044,661.8 FTE
2026-054,528.1 FTE
2026-064,546.7 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

All staff groups: Headcount

4,879 staff

4,879 staff was reported for “All staff groups: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: All staff groups: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 05,002. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-064,902 staff
2025-074,893 staff
2025-084,880 staff
2025-094,950 staff
2025-104,957 staff
2025-114,975 staff
2025-124,970 staff
2026-014,993 staff
2026-024,989 staff
2026-034,999 staff
2026-045,002 staff
2026-054,859 staff
2026-064,879 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

NHS infrastructure support: Full-time equivalent

812.5 FTE

812.5 FTE was reported for “NHS infrastructure support: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: NHS infrastructure support: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0898.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06879.1 FTE
2025-07876.2 FTE
2025-08879.1 FTE
2025-09887.1 FTE
2025-10886.9 FTE
2025-11885.4 FTE
2025-12886.8 FTE
2026-01891 FTE
2026-02895.2 FTE
2026-03898.1 FTE
2026-04898.7 FTE
2026-05813.4 FTE
2026-06812.5 FTE
Explore 39 additional measures

June 2026 reporting organisation

NHS infrastructure support: Headcount

849 staff

849 staff was reported for “NHS infrastructure support: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: NHS infrastructure support: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0945. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06927 staff
2025-07924 staff
2025-08926 staff
2025-09935 staff
2025-10935 staff
2025-11934 staff
2025-12935 staff
2026-01939 staff
2026-02943 staff
2026-03945 staff
2026-04945 staff
2026-05851 staff
2026-06849 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Central functions: Full-time equivalent

481 FTE

481 FTE was reported for “Central functions: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Central functions: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0481. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06465.1 FTE
2025-07459 FTE
2025-08465 FTE
2025-09470.2 FTE
2025-10464.9 FTE
2025-11464.8 FTE
2025-12464.9 FTE
2026-01471.1 FTE
2026-02474.4 FTE
2026-03477.3 FTE
2026-04477.7 FTE
2026-05481 FTE
2026-06481 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Central functions: Headcount

508 staff

508 staff was reported for “Central functions: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Central functions: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0508. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06488 staff
2025-07482 staff
2025-08488 staff
2025-09495 staff
2025-10491 staff
2025-11491 staff
2025-12491 staff
2026-01498 staff
2026-02501 staff
2026-03504 staff
2026-04504 staff
2026-05508 staff
2026-06508 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Hotel, property & estates: Full-time equivalent

86.4 FTE

86.4 FTE was reported for “Hotel, property & estates: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Hotel, property & estates: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0181.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06176.2 FTE
2025-07175.7 FTE
2025-08175.7 FTE
2025-09177.6 FTE
2025-10181.8 FTE
2025-11180.5 FTE
2025-12181.5 FTE
2026-01179.7 FTE
2026-02179.5 FTE
2026-03177 FTE
2026-04175.5 FTE
2026-0588 FTE
2026-0686.4 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Hotel, property & estates: Headcount

90 staff

90 staff was reported for “Hotel, property & estates: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Hotel, property & estates: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0197. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06191 staff
2025-07190 staff
2025-08190 staff
2025-09193 staff
2025-10197 staff
2025-11196 staff
2025-12197 staff
2026-01194 staff
2026-02194 staff
2026-03191 staff
2026-04189 staff
2026-0592 staff
2026-0690 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Managers: Full-time equivalent

180.1 FTE

180.1 FTE was reported for “Managers: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Managers: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0183. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06179.2 FTE
2025-07183 FTE
2025-08178.9 FTE
2025-09178.6 FTE
2025-10174.4 FTE
2025-11174.3 FTE
2025-12173.4 FTE
2026-01175.4 FTE
2026-02176.3 FTE
2026-03176.8 FTE
2026-04179.5 FTE
2026-05179.4 FTE
2026-06180.1 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Managers: Headcount

187 staff

187 staff was reported for “Managers: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Managers: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0194. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06190 staff
2025-07194 staff
2025-08189 staff
2025-09187 staff
2025-10182 staff
2025-11182 staff
2025-12181 staff
2026-01183 staff
2026-02184 staff
2026-03184 staff
2026-04187 staff
2026-05187 staff
2026-06187 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Senior managers: Full-time equivalent

65 FTE

65 FTE was reported for “Senior managers: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Senior managers: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 067. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0658.5 FTE
2025-0758.5 FTE
2025-0859.5 FTE
2025-0960.7 FTE
2025-1065.9 FTE
2025-1165.9 FTE
2025-1267 FTE
2026-0164.8 FTE
2026-0265 FTE
2026-0367 FTE
2026-0466 FTE
2026-0565 FTE
2026-0665 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Senior managers: Headcount

66 staff

66 staff was reported for “Senior managers: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Senior managers: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 068. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0660 staff
2025-0760 staff
2025-0861 staff
2025-0962 staff
2025-1067 staff
2025-1167 staff
2025-1268 staff
2026-0166 staff
2026-0266 staff
2026-0368 staff
2026-0467 staff
2026-0566 staff
2026-0666 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Professionally qualified clinical staff: Full-time equivalent

2,625.6 FTE

2,625.6 FTE was reported for “Professionally qualified clinical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Professionally qualified clinical staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 02,628.3. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-062,553 FTE
2025-072,549.1 FTE
2025-082,539.8 FTE
2025-092,582.1 FTE
2025-102,587.3 FTE
2025-112,594.6 FTE
2025-122,596.2 FTE
2026-012,613.9 FTE
2026-022,617.3 FTE
2026-032,628.3 FTE
2026-042,623.8 FTE
2026-052,615.5 FTE
2026-062,625.6 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Professionally qualified clinical staff: Headcount

2,829 staff

2,829 staff was reported for “Professionally qualified clinical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Professionally qualified clinical staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 02,829. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-062,755 staff
2025-072,746 staff
2025-082,733 staff
2025-092,780 staff
2025-102,784 staff
2025-112,795 staff
2025-122,798 staff
2026-012,816 staff
2026-022,816 staff
2026-032,827 staff
2026-042,826 staff
2026-052,818 staff
2026-062,829 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Ambulance staff: Full-time equivalent

1 FTE

1 FTE was reported for “Ambulance staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ambulance staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061 FTE
2025-071 FTE
2025-081 FTE
2025-091 FTE
2025-101 FTE
2025-111 FTE
2025-121.7 FTE
2026-011 FTE
2026-021 FTE
2026-031 FTE
2026-041 FTE
2026-051 FTE
2026-061 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Ambulance staff: Headcount

1 staff

1 staff was reported for “Ambulance staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ambulance staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061 staff
2025-071 staff
2025-081 staff
2025-091 staff
2025-101 staff
2025-111 staff
2025-122 staff
2026-011 staff
2026-021 staff
2026-031 staff
2026-041 staff
2026-051 staff
2026-061 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - All grades: Full-time equivalent

542 FTE

542 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - All grades: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - All grades: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0554.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06521.2 FTE
2025-07525.7 FTE
2025-08522.5 FTE
2025-09537.5 FTE
2025-10541 FTE
2025-11547.8 FTE
2025-12541.6 FTE
2026-01543.4 FTE
2026-02545.4 FTE
2026-03554.8 FTE
2026-04549.5 FTE
2026-05541.2 FTE
2026-06542 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - All grades: Headcount

577 staff

577 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - All grades: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - All grades: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0590. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06557 staff
2025-07560 staff
2025-08554 staff
2025-09572 staff
2025-10574 staff
2025-11582 staff
2025-12577 staff
2026-01580 staff
2026-02581 staff
2026-03590 staff
2026-04584 staff
2026-05576 staff
2026-06577 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Full-time equivalent

10.4 FTE

10.4 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 011. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-067.6 FTE
2025-078.6 FTE
2025-089 FTE
2025-0911 FTE
2025-1011 FTE
2025-1111 FTE
2025-1211 FTE
2026-0111 FTE
2026-0211 FTE
2026-0311 FTE
2026-0410.4 FTE
2026-0510.4 FTE
2026-0610.4 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Headcount

11 staff

11 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 012. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-068 staff
2025-079 staff
2025-089 staff
2025-0912 staff
2025-1012 staff
2025-1112 staff
2025-1212 staff
2026-0112 staff
2026-0212 staff
2026-0312 staff
2026-0411 staff
2026-0511 staff
2026-0611 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Consultant: Full-time equivalent

235.4 FTE

235.4 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Consultant: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Consultant: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0235.4. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06222.4 FTE
2025-07223.4 FTE
2025-08222.5 FTE
2025-09225 FTE
2025-10226.6 FTE
2025-11227.8 FTE
2025-12227.3 FTE
2026-01231.5 FTE
2026-02233.4 FTE
2026-03233.4 FTE
2026-04233.4 FTE
2026-05232.8 FTE
2026-06235.4 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Consultant: Headcount

259 staff

259 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Consultant: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Consultant: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0259. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06245 staff
2025-07246 staff
2025-08245 staff
2025-09249 staff
2025-10249 staff
2025-11251 staff
2025-12250 staff
2026-01256 staff
2026-02258 staff
2026-03257 staff
2026-04257 staff
2026-05256 staff
2026-06259 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Core Training: Full-time equivalent

103.2 FTE

103.2 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Core Training: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Core Training: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0107. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0699.6 FTE
2025-07103.6 FTE
2025-08100.6 FTE
2025-09101.8 FTE
2025-10101.8 FTE
2025-11104.8 FTE
2025-12104.5 FTE
2026-01104.3 FTE
2026-02103.6 FTE
2026-03107 FTE
2026-04105.1 FTE
2026-05102.1 FTE
2026-06103.2 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Core Training: Headcount

105 staff

105 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Core Training: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Core Training: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0109. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06104 staff
2025-07108 staff
2025-08104 staff
2025-09105 staff
2025-10105 staff
2025-11108 staff
2025-12108 staff
2026-01107 staff
2026-02106 staff
2026-03109 staff
2026-04107 staff
2026-05104 staff
2026-06105 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Full-time equivalent

3 FTE

3 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 04. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-064 FTE
2025-074 FTE
2025-083 FTE
2025-093 FTE
2025-103 FTE
2025-113 FTE
2025-123 FTE
2026-013 FTE
2026-023 FTE
2026-033 FTE
2026-043 FTE
2026-053 FTE
2026-063 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Headcount

3 staff

3 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 04. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-064 staff
2025-074 staff
2025-083 staff
2025-093 staff
2025-103 staff
2025-113 staff
2025-123 staff
2026-013 staff
2026-023 staff
2026-033 staff
2026-043 staff
2026-053 staff
2026-063 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Full-time equivalent

18.2 FTE

18.2 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 023.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0620 FTE
2025-0721 FTE
2025-0823.1 FTE
2025-0922.8 FTE
2025-1023.2 FTE
2025-1123 FTE
2025-1223 FTE
2026-0123 FTE
2026-0222.2 FTE
2026-0322.2 FTE
2026-0418.2 FTE
2026-0517.2 FTE
2026-0618.2 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Headcount

20 staff

20 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 025. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0622 staff
2025-0723 staff
2025-0825 staff
2025-0924 staff
2025-1025 staff
2025-1125 staff
2025-1225 staff
2026-0125 staff
2026-0224 staff
2026-0324 staff
2026-0420 staff
2026-0519 staff
2026-0620 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Full-time equivalent

171.9 FTE

171.9 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0179.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06167.7 FTE
2025-07165.1 FTE
2025-08164.4 FTE
2025-09174 FTE
2025-10175.5 FTE
2025-11178.3 FTE
2025-12172.8 FTE
2026-01170.7 FTE
2026-02172.2 FTE
2026-03178.3 FTE
2026-04179.5 FTE
2026-05175.8 FTE
2026-06171.9 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Headcount

179 staff

179 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0186. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06177 staff
2025-07173 staff
2025-08172 staff
2025-09182 staff
2025-10183 staff
2025-11186 staff
2025-12181 staff
2026-01178 staff
2026-02179 staff
2026-03185 staff
2026-04186 staff
2026-05183 staff
2026-06179 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Nurses & health visitors: Full-time equivalent

1,218.9 FTE

1,218.9 FTE was reported for “Nurses & health visitors: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Nurses & health visitors: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,218.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,193.4 FTE
2025-071,189 FTE
2025-081,184.7 FTE
2025-091,205.2 FTE
2025-101,205.8 FTE
2025-111,204.3 FTE
2025-121,206.6 FTE
2026-011,215.4 FTE
2026-021,209.7 FTE
2026-031,207.2 FTE
2026-041,211.5 FTE
2026-051,208.9 FTE
2026-061,218.9 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Nurses & health visitors: Headcount

1,319 staff

1,319 staff was reported for “Nurses & health visitors: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Nurses & health visitors: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,319. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,292 staff
2025-071,284 staff
2025-081,279 staff
2025-091,300 staff
2025-101,301 staff
2025-111,302 staff
2025-121,304 staff
2026-011,312 staff
2026-021,304 staff
2026-031,302 staff
2026-041,309 staff
2026-051,307 staff
2026-061,319 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Full-time equivalent

863.8 FTE

863.8 FTE was reported for “Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0865.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06837.4 FTE
2025-07833.4 FTE
2025-08831.7 FTE
2025-09838.4 FTE
2025-10839.4 FTE
2025-11841.5 FTE
2025-12846.3 FTE
2026-01854.1 FTE
2026-02861.2 FTE
2026-03865.2 FTE
2026-04861.9 FTE
2026-05864.4 FTE
2026-06863.8 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Headcount

933 staff

933 staff was reported for “Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0935. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06905 staff
2025-07901 staff
2025-08899 staff
2025-09908 staff
2025-10909 staff
2025-11911 staff
2025-12916 staff
2026-01924 staff
2026-02931 staff
2026-03935 staff
2026-04933 staff
2026-05935 staff
2026-06933 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to clinical staff: Full-time equivalent

1,107.6 FTE

1,107.6 FTE was reported for “Support to clinical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to clinical staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,154. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,136 FTE
2025-071,134.9 FTE
2025-081,132.6 FTE
2025-091,145.5 FTE
2025-101,148.3 FTE
2025-111,154 FTE
2025-121,143.3 FTE
2026-011,143.2 FTE
2026-021,134.8 FTE
2026-031,134.1 FTE
2026-041,138.3 FTE
2026-051,098.3 FTE
2026-061,107.6 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to clinical staff: Headcount

1,201 staff

1,201 staff was reported for “Support to clinical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to clinical staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,245. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,221 staff
2025-071,224 staff
2025-081,220 staff
2025-091,234 staff
2025-101,236 staff
2025-111,245 staff
2025-121,235 staff
2026-011,236 staff
2026-021,228 staff
2026-031,226 staff
2026-041,231 staff
2026-051,190 staff
2026-061,201 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent

802.2 FTE

802.2 FTE was reported for “Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0848.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06837.5 FTE
2025-07835.6 FTE
2025-08835.9 FTE
2025-09848.5 FTE
2025-10844.1 FTE
2025-11848.7 FTE
2025-12839.2 FTE
2026-01840 FTE
2026-02834.2 FTE
2026-03835.4 FTE
2026-04838.4 FTE
2026-05796.5 FTE
2026-06802.2 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Headcount

871 staff

871 staff was reported for “Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0916. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06902 staff
2025-07902 staff
2025-08901 staff
2025-09915 staff
2025-10911 staff
2025-11916 staff
2025-12906 staff
2026-01908 staff
2026-02902 staff
2026-03902 staff
2026-04907 staff
2026-05864 staff
2026-06871 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to ST&T staff: Full-time equivalent

305.4 FTE

305.4 FTE was reported for “Support to ST&T staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to ST&T staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0305.4. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06298.6 FTE
2025-07299.2 FTE
2025-08296.7 FTE
2025-09297 FTE
2025-10304.1 FTE
2025-11305.4 FTE
2025-12304.2 FTE
2026-01303.3 FTE
2026-02300.7 FTE
2026-03298.7 FTE
2026-04299.9 FTE
2026-05301.8 FTE
2026-06305.4 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to ST&T staff: Headcount

330 staff

330 staff was reported for “Support to ST&T staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to ST&T staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0330. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06319 staff
2025-07322 staff
2025-08319 staff
2025-09319 staff
2025-10325 staff
2025-11329 staff
2025-12329 staff
2026-01328 staff
2026-02326 staff
2026-03324 staff
2026-04324 staff
2026-05326 staff
2026-06330 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Unknown classification: Full-time equivalent

1 FTE

1 FTE was reported for “Unknown classification: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Unknown classification: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-082026-06 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-082 FTE
2025-092 FTE
2025-102 FTE
2025-112 FTE
2025-122 FTE
2026-012 FTE
2026-022 FTE
2026-031 FTE
2026-041 FTE
2026-051 FTE
2026-061 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Unknown classification: Headcount

1 staff

1 staff was reported for “Unknown classification: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Unknown classification: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ074 (2011-10-01 00:00:00): Staff transfer from Sutton and Merton PCT (5M7) to Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) DQ180 (2016-04-01 00:00:00): A decrease of 200 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of community health services in Merton to Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust (RYX). DQ314 (2019-04-01 00:00:00): 400 staff transferred from Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) to Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (RVR), following the establishment of Sutton Health and Care to provide community services in Sutton and whose staff are employed by Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust. DQ552 (2026-05-01 00:00:00): Decrease of 140 staff at Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust (RPY) following the transfer of some facilities staff to a private provider (ISS).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-082026-06 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-082 staff
2025-092 staff
2025-102 staff
2025-112 staff
2025-122 staff
2026-012 staff
2026-022 staff
2026-031 staff
2026-041 staff
2026-051 staff
2026-061 staff

For your decision These numbers do not show the staffing of a particular ward or appointment.

Infection surveillance: historical context

Historical reported infections, with surveillance definitions and reporting coverage.

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated

2 reported cases

2 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 84 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-072 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-112 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-072 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 03. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-073 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-092 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-121 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-022 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-063 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset indeterminate association (COIA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust between 29 and 84 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 03. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-123 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases
Explore 34 additional measures

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

4 reported cases

4 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is 3 days or more after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 06. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-082 reported cases
2025-093 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-116 reported cases
2025-123 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-024 reported cases
2026-032 reported cases
2026-042 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-074 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Total cases

8 reported cases

8 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 08. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-075 reported cases
2025-084 reported cases
2025-096 reported cases
2025-105 reported cases
2025-118 reported cases
2025-127 reported cases
2026-015 reported cases
2026-026 reported cases
2026-033 reported cases
2026-043 reported cases
2026-052 reported cases
2026-064 reported cases
2026-078 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: The reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the 3 months prior to CDI case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Community-onset, community-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 06. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-083 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-106 reported cases
2025-113 reported cases
2025-122 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-032 reported cases
2026-042 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-062 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 04. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-074 reported cases
2025-082 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-112 reported cases
2025-122 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-042 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

7 reported cases

7 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 08. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-078 reported cases
2025-082 reported cases
2025-093 reported cases
2025-104 reported cases
2025-114 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-015 reported cases
2026-022 reported cases
2026-036 reported cases
2026-042 reported cases
2026-056 reported cases
2026-063 reported cases
2026-077 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Total cases

8 reported cases

8 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 013. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0713 reported cases
2025-087 reported cases
2025-095 reported cases
2025-1012 reported cases
2025-119 reported cases
2025-124 reported cases
2026-017 reported cases
2026-023 reported cases
2026-038 reported cases
2026-046 reported cases
2026-056 reported cases
2026-065 reported cases
2026-078 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the E. coli case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, community-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 03. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-092 reported cases
2025-103 reported cases
2025-112 reported cases
2025-123 reported cases
2026-013 reported cases
2026-022 reported cases
2026-032 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 03. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-073 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

4 reported cases

4 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 04. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-072 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-092 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-113 reported cases
2025-124 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-063 reported cases
2026-074 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Total cases

5 reported cases

5 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 07. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-076 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-095 reported cases
2025-104 reported cases
2025-116 reported cases
2025-127 reported cases
2026-014 reported cases
2026-023 reported cases
2026-033 reported cases
2026-042 reported cases
2026-052 reported cases
2026-065 reported cases
2026-075 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the Klebsiella spp. case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Community-onset, community-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Total cases

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'Don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the MRSA case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Community-onset, community-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-092 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Total cases

2 reported cases

2 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 03. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-093 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-072 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the MSSA case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, community-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-121 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-062 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-042 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-062 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

2 reported cases

2 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 04. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-084 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-122 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-024 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-052 reported cases
2026-063 reported cases
2026-072 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Total cases

3 reported cases

3 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 07. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-072 reported cases
2025-086 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-112 reported cases
2025-123 reported cases
2026-015 reported cases
2026-026 reported cases
2026-032 reported cases
2026-044 reported cases
2026-053 reported cases
2026-067 reported cases
2026-073 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: THE ROYAL MARSDEN NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the P. aeruginosa case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

For your decision Raw counts cannot rank hospitals with different sizes and patient groups.

National infection context and why counts cannot rank hospitals

Organisation environment: PLACE assessments

Environment assessments reported across an organisation, potentially covering several sites.

2025 reporting organisation

Cleanliness assessment

99.7%

99.7% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cleanliness assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment

97.2%

97.2% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Dementia assessment

85.5%

85.5% was reported for “Dementia assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Dementia assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

Explore 5 additional measures

2025 reporting organisation

Disability assessment

91%

91% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Disability assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Food assessment

93.6%

93.6% was reported for “Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Food assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Organisation Food assessment

99.5%

99.5% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Organisation Food assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment

93.7%

93.7% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Ward Food assessment

90.8%

90.8% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ward Food assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

For your decision Confirm the arrangements at the exact building you will attend.

About this organisation

Recorded care types
NHS trusts, Provider groups
Local authority area
Kensington and Chelsea
Funding information
NHS organisation — confirm the service’s funding
NHS organisation code
RPY
CQC identifier
RPY

CQC inspection evidence

Keep the publication date and assessed service in view. Ratings are reproduced as categories; they are not averaged into a score.

AssessmentRatingPublished
CaringOutstanding16 January 2020
EffectiveOutstanding16 January 2020
OverallOutstanding16 January 2020
ResponsiveOutstanding16 January 2020
SafeGood16 January 2020
Well-ledOutstanding16 January 2020
Ratings for specific services and population groups (18)
AssessmentRatingPublished
Community end of life care
Caring
Good18 September 2018
Community end of life care
Effective
Good18 September 2018
Community end of life care
Overall
Good18 September 2018
Community end of life care
Responsive
Good18 September 2018
Community end of life care
Safe
Good18 September 2018
Community end of life care
Well-led
Good18 September 2018
Community health services for adults
Caring
Good19 January 2017
Community health services for adults
Effective
Requires improvement19 January 2017
Community health services for adults
Overall
Requires improvement19 January 2017
Community health services for adults
Responsive
Good19 January 2017
Community health services for adults
Safe
Requires improvement19 January 2017
Community health services for adults
Well-led
Requires improvement19 January 2017
Community health services for children, young people and families
Caring
Good18 September 2018
Community health services for children, young people and families
Effective
Good18 September 2018
Community health services for children, young people and families
Overall
Good18 September 2018
Community health services for children, young people and families
Responsive
Good18 September 2018
Community health services for children, young people and families
Safe
Good18 September 2018
Community health services for children, young people and families
Well-led
Good18 September 2018

Service evidence

Connected organisations and services

Sources and coverage

Source changes may take time to appear here. Suggest a correction · Represent this provider