Hospitals · Croydon
The Shirley Oaks Hospital
Poppy Lane, Shirley Oaks Village, Croydon, Surrey, CR9 8AB
MAKE YOUR VISIT EASIER
Contact, travel and your visit
Plan around the exact appointment location. The registered address can differ from the entrance or department you need.
Contact the service
02086555500Website and contact optionsNo verified public email address is included in this directory record. Use the service’s published contact route.
Opening and appointment times
Confirm today’s hours directly. Reception, telephone and individual clinic hours can differ.
Check current timesAccessibility and facilities
Check step-free access, accessible toilets, hearing support, interpreters and any help you need before travelling.
Ask about access arrangementsNearby places use the directory’s map reference point, which may be a postcode centre. Distances are approximate straight lines, not walking routes. Check the entrance, route and current arrangements.
Nearby transport stops
- Poppy LaneBus stop · ->EAbout 300 m in a straight line
- Hazel CloseBus stop · ->WAbout 400 m in a straight line
- Tulip CloseBus stop · ->NAbout 400 m in a straight line
- Woodside Tram StopMetro or tram accessAbout 800 m in a straight line
- Arena Tram StopMetro or tram accessAbout 800 m in a straight line
Bus stops within 1 km; rail and other access points within 3 km. A listed stop does not confirm a current timetable.
DfT NaPTAN · downloaded 10 September 2026 · Open Government Licence.
Mapped parking nearby
- World Of GolfMapped car parkAbout 900 m in a straight line
- Dragon QuestMapped car parkAbout 1000 m in a straight line
These are nearby mapped car parks, not confirmed visitor parking for this service. Check access restrictions, charges, hours and Blue Badge arrangements with the operator.
© OpenStreetMap contributors · 9 September 2026 · ODbL. Data and coverage.
What to expect and prepare
General planning guidance; your service’s instructions take priority. NHS hospital visit guidance · Travel and access checklist.
Questions about visiting The Shirley Oaks Hospital
What are the opening and visiting times?
Verified opening hours are not included in this directory record. Check the service’s website or call 02086555500 before travelling. Individual wards can have different visiting arrangements.
Do I need an appointment or referral?
Contact the service to confirm the booking or referral route for the exact care you need. Published activity and waiting figures do not show current appointment availability.
Can I park here, and is there accessible parking?
Check the service’s current parking instructions. Nearby map listings are separate from on-site visitor parking; neither a map entry nor historical parking figures confirm a space, price or Blue Badge concession today.
How can I arrange help with access or communication?
Contact the service before your visit and explain the help you need. Ask about the exact entrance, step-free routes, toilets, hearing support or interpretation; facilities are not inferred from the type of service.
What can I learn about The Shirley Oaks Hospital?
The recorded overall CQC rating is “Good”, dated 15 January 2020. Use the contact and visiting details above to check the service you need, then compare the dated evidence below.
UNDERSTAND YOUR OPTIONS
Care and access: the published picture
Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.
Referral-to-treatment pathways
How long treatment pathways had already been waiting at the reporting date. One person can have more than one pathway.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
67.9%Total
67.9% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1,126 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1,126; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1,126 waiting-list entriesTotal
1,126 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
96 waiting-list entriesGeneral Surgery Service
96 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
Explore 43 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
99 waiting-list entriesUrology Service
99 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
481 waiting-list entriesTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
481 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
57 waiting-list entriesOphthalmology Service
57 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
205 waiting-list entriesGastroenterology Service
205 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1 waiting-list entriesNeurology Service
1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1 waiting-list entriesRheumatology Service
1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Rheumatology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
34 waiting-list entriesGynaecology Service
34 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
152 waiting-list entriesOther - Other Services
152 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
79.2%General Surgery Service
79.2% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 96 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 96; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
66.7%Urology Service
66.7% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 99 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 99; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
69.7%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
69.7% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 481 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 481; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
61.4%Ophthalmology Service
61.4% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 57 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 57; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
69.8%Gastroenterology Service
69.8% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 205 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 205; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
0%Neurology Service
0% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
0%Rheumatology Service
0% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Rheumatology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
8.8%Gynaecology Service
8.8% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 34 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 34; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
70.4%Other - Other Services
70.4% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 152 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 152; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%General Surgery Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 96 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 96; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
1%Urology Service
1% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 99 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 99; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.6%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
0.6% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 481 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 481; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Ophthalmology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 57 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 57; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Gastroenterology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 205 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 205; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Neurology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Rheumatology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Rheumatology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Gynaecology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 34 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 34; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.4%Total
0.4% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1,126 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1,126; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Other - Other Services
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 152 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 152; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
9 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
9 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
6 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
6 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
19 pathwaysUrology Service
19 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
14 pathwaysUrology Service
14 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
45 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
45 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
85 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
85 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways
7 pathwaysOphthalmology Service
7 pathways was reported for “Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ophthalmology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
4 pathwaysOphthalmology Service
4 pathways was reported for “Ophthalmology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways
44 pathwaysGastroenterology Service
44 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
16 pathwaysGastroenterology Service
16 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
2 pathwaysGynaecology Service
2 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
1 pathwaysGynaecology Service
1 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed admitted pathways
138 pathwaysTotal
138 pathways was reported for “Total: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed non-admitted pathways
139 pathwaysTotal
139 pathways was reported for “Total: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways
12 pathwaysOther - Other Services
12 pathways was reported for “Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways
13 pathwaysOther - Other Services
13 pathways was reported for “Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
Diagnostic tests and waiting lists
Historical diagnostic waiting lists and completed test activity describe different groups.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
24 waiting-list entries24 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
3 waiting-list entries3 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
3 waiting-list entries3 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Explore 21 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
12 waiting-list entries12 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
11 waiting-list entries11 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
7 waiting-list entries7 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
10 waiting-list entries10 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
70 waiting-list entries70 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
4.2%4.2% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 24 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 24; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 12 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 12; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 11 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 11; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 7 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 7; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 10 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 10; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
1.4%1.4% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 70 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 70; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
88 tests88 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
29 tests29 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
3 tests3 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
38 tests38 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
12 tests12 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
91 tests91 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
18 tests18 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
279 tests279 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Patient-reported hip and knee outcomes
Patient-reported change after hip or knee replacement, adjusted by the publisher for the specified cohort.
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Explore 105 additional measures
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
20 pairs20 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
77.5 EQ VAS points77.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
66.1 EQ VAS points66.1 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
11.4 EQ VAS points11.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
4 pairs4 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
41.4 Oxford Hip Score points41.4 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
20 Oxford Hip Score points20 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
21.4 Oxford Hip Score points21.4 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.7 EQ-5D Index points0.7 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
26 pairs26 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
74.3 EQ VAS points74.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
63.1 EQ VAS points63.1 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
11.2 EQ VAS points11.2 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
20 pairs20 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
26 pairs26 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
4 pairs4 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
37.2 Oxford Knee Score points37.2 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
18.8 Oxford Knee Score points18.8 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
18.4 Oxford Knee Score points18.4 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
24 pairs24 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
26 pairs26 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
20 pairs20 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
77.5 EQ VAS points77.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
66.1 EQ VAS points66.1 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
11.4 EQ VAS points11.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
4 pairs4 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
41.4 Oxford Hip Score points41.4 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
20 Oxford Hip Score points20 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
21.4 Oxford Hip Score points21.4 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 21.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.7 EQ-5D Index points0.7 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
21 pairs21 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
26 pairs26 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
74.3 EQ VAS points74.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
63.1 EQ VAS points63.1 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
11.2 EQ VAS points11.2 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
20 pairs20 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
26 pairs26 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
4 pairs4 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Exact value withheldThe publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
37.2 Oxford Knee Score points37.2 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
18.8 Oxford Knee Score points18.8 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
18.4 Oxford Knee Score points18.4 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
24 pairs24 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
26 pairs26 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 26.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT436.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Hospital environment: PLACE assessments
Assessments of the hospital environment, separate from clinical outcomes.
2025 hospital site
Cleanliness assessment
99%99% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cleanliness assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Combined Food assessment
90.6%90.6% was reported for “Combined Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Combined Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
99.7%99.7% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
Explore 5 additional measures
2025 hospital site
Dementia assessment
97.9%97.9% was reported for “Dementia assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Dementia assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Disability assessment
99.6%99.6% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Disability assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Organisation Food assessment
96.2%96.2% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Organisation Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
98.9%98.9% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Ward Food assessment
85.3%85.3% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ward Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
About this service
- Recorded care types
- Hospitals, Tests and diagnostics
- Local authority area
- Croydon
- Funding information
- Confirm directly with the provider
- Registered provider
- Circle Health Group Limited
- Telephone in source record
- 02086555500
- NHS organisation code
- NT436
- CQC identifier
- 1-128767270
Registered specialisms
- Sensory impairments
- Caring for adults under 65 yrs
- Dementia
- Learning disabilities
- Caring for adults over 65 yrs
- Physical disabilities
These are specialisms in the regulatory record. They do not confirm that a particular treatment, assessment or place is currently available.
CQC inspection evidence
Keep the publication date and assessed service in view. Ratings are reproduced as categories; they are not averaged into a score.
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Safe | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Effective | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Caring | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Responsive | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Well-led | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Overall | Good | 15 January 2020 |
Ratings for specific services and population groups (16)
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic imaging Safe | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Diagnostic imaging Caring | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Diagnostic imaging Responsive | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Diagnostic imaging Well-led | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Diagnostic imaging Overall | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Outpatients Safe | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Outpatients Caring | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Outpatients Responsive | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Outpatients Well-led | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Outpatients Overall | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Surgery Safe | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Surgery Effective | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Surgery Caring | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Surgery Responsive | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Surgery Well-led | Good | 15 January 2020 |
| Surgery Overall | Good | 15 January 2020 |
Service evidence
- Urology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for urology serviceCheck official service information - General Surgery ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for general surgery serviceCheck official service information - Trauma and Orthopaedic ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for trauma and orthopaedic serviceCheck official service information - Ophthalmology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for ophthalmology serviceCheck official service information - Gastroenterology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for gastroenterology serviceCheck official service information - Gynaecology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for gynaecology serviceCheck official service information - Other - Other ServicesCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for other - other servicesCheck official service information - Rheumatology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for rheumatology serviceCheck official service information - Neurology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for neurology serviceCheck official service information - MRICurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for mriCheck official service information - CTCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for ctCheck official service information - NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUNDCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for non_obstetric_ultrasoundCheck official service information - COLONOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for colonoscopyCheck official service information - FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for flexi_sigmoidoscopyCheck official service information - CYSTOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for cystoscopyCheck official service information - GASTROSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for gastroscopyCheck official service information
Regulated activities
- Diagnostic and screening procedures
- Family planning
- Surgical procedures
- Treatment of disease, disorder or injury
Connected organisations and services
- Circle Health Group LimitedRegistered provider
Sources and coverage
- Care Quality Commission registerDirectory: 9 September 2026; detailed register: 1 September 2026 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
- Referral-to-treatment waiting times2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Diagnostic waiting times and activity2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement2024/25 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- PLACE: hospital environment assessments2025 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
Source changes may take time to appear here. Suggest a correction · Represent this provider
More options in Croydon
Explore the areaCroydon University Hospital
Croydon, CR7 7YE
Hospital
View service detailsMayday Satellite Dialysis Unit
Thornton Heath, CR7 7YE
Hospital · Doctors/GPs · Long-term conditions
View service detailsMoorfields at Croydon University Hospital
Croydon, CR7 7YE
Hospital
View service detailsPurley War Memorial Hospital
Purley, CR8 2YL
Hospital
View service details