Hospitals · Reading
The Berkshire Independent Hospital
Swallowscroft, Wensley Road, Reading, Berkshire, RG1 6UZ
MAKE YOUR VISIT EASIER
Contact, travel and your visit
Plan around the exact appointment location. The registered address can differ from the entrance or department you need.
Contact the service
01189028000Website and contact optionsNo verified public email address is included in this directory record. Use the service’s published contact route.
Opening and appointment times
Confirm today’s hours directly. Reception, telephone and individual clinic hours can differ.
Check current timesAccessibility and facilities
Check step-free access, accessible toilets, hearing support, interpreters and any help you need before travelling.
Ask about access arrangementsNearby places use the directory’s map reference point, which may be a postcode centre. Distances are approximate straight lines, not walking routes. Check the entrance, route and current arrangements.
Nearby transport stops
- Coley Park HouseBus stop · adjacent toAbout under 100 m in a straight line
- Coley Park HouseBus stop · nrAbout 100 m in a straight line
- Coley Park HouseBus stop · oppositeAbout 100 m in a straight line
- Reading West Rail StationRail station entrance · EntranceAbout 900 m in a straight line
- Reading West Rail StationRail stationAbout 1.2 km in a straight line
Bus stops within 1 km; rail and other access points within 3 km. A listed stop does not confirm a current timetable.
DfT NaPTAN · downloaded 10 September 2026 · Open Government Licence.
Mapped parking nearby
- Civic Centre BMapped car park · Reading Borough CouncilAbout 1.3 km in a straight line
- Civic Centre BMapped car park · Reading Borough CouncilAbout 1.3 km in a straight line
- Pavilion car parkMapped car parkAbout 1.4 km in a straight line
These are nearby mapped car parks, not confirmed visitor parking for this service. Check access restrictions, charges, hours and Blue Badge arrangements with the operator.
© OpenStreetMap contributors · 9 September 2026 · ODbL. Data and coverage.
What to expect and prepare
General planning guidance; your service’s instructions take priority. NHS hospital visit guidance · Travel and access checklist.
Questions about visiting The Berkshire Independent Hospital
What are the opening and visiting times?
Verified opening hours are not included in this directory record. Check the service’s website or call 01189028000 before travelling. Individual wards can have different visiting arrangements.
Do I need an appointment or referral?
Contact the service to confirm the booking or referral route for the exact care you need. Published activity and waiting figures do not show current appointment availability.
Can I park here, and is there accessible parking?
Check the service’s current parking instructions. Nearby map listings are separate from on-site visitor parking; neither a map entry nor historical parking figures confirm a space, price or Blue Badge concession today.
How can I arrange help with access or communication?
Contact the service before your visit and explain the help you need. Ask about the exact entrance, step-free routes, toilets, hearing support or interpretation; facilities are not inferred from the type of service.
What can I learn about The Berkshire Independent Hospital?
The recorded overall CQC rating is “Good”, dated 19 May 2020. Use the contact and visiting details above to check the service you need, then compare the dated evidence below.
Published treatment prices
This provider appears in our sourced cost guides. Check the precise procedure, package and any separate charges before requesting a personal quote.
An advertised fee does not confirm availability or that the treatment is suitable for you.
UNDERSTAND YOUR OPTIONS
Care and access: the published picture
Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.
Referral-to-treatment pathways
How long treatment pathways had already been waiting at the reporting date. One person can have more than one pathway.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
72.6%Total
72.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1,231 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1,231; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1,231 waiting-list entriesTotal
1,231 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
147 waiting-list entriesGeneral Surgery Service
147 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
Explore 33 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
241 waiting-list entriesUrology Service
241 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
652 waiting-list entriesTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
652 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
89 waiting-list entriesOphthalmology Service
89 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
3 waiting-list entriesPlastic Surgery Service
3 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1 waiting-list entriesGastroenterology Service
1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
98 waiting-list entriesGynaecology Service
98 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
86.4%General Surgery Service
86.4% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 147 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 147; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
72.6%Urology Service
72.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 241 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 241; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
70.9%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
70.9% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 652 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 652; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
96.6%Ophthalmology Service
96.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 89 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 89; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
100%Plastic Surgery Service
100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
100%Gastroenterology Service
100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
40.8%Gynaecology Service
40.8% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 98 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 98; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.7%General Surgery Service
0.7% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 147 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 147; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.8%Urology Service
0.8% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 241 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 241; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.3%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
0.3% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 652 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 652; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Ophthalmology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 89 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 89; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Plastic Surgery Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Gastroenterology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Gynaecology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 98 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 98; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.4%Total
0.4% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1,231 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1,231; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
9 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
9 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
16 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
16 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
16 pathwaysUrology Service
16 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
3 pathwaysUrology Service
3 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
44 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
44 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
29 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
29 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways
5 pathwaysOphthalmology Service
5 pathways was reported for “Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
2 pathwaysGastroenterology Service
2 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
2 pathwaysGynaecology Service
2 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
2 pathwaysGynaecology Service
2 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed admitted pathways
76 pathwaysTotal
76 pathways was reported for “Total: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed non-admitted pathways
52 pathwaysTotal
52 pathways was reported for “Total: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
Diagnostic tests and waiting lists
Historical diagnostic waiting lists and completed test activity describe different groups.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
11 waiting-list entries11 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
29 waiting-list entries29 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
3 waiting-list entries3 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Explore 30 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
3 waiting-list entries3 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
7 waiting-list entries7 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
28 waiting-list entries28 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
13 waiting-list entries13 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
68 waiting-list entries68 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
17 waiting-list entries17 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
180 waiting-list entries180 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
1 waiting-list entries1 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: URODYNAMICS: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
36.4%36.4% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 11 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 11; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
69%69% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 29 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 29; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
66.7%66.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
100%100% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
14.3%14.3% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 7 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 7; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
17.9%17.9% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 28 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 28; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
7.7%7.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 13 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 13; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
16.2%16.2% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 68 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 68; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
88.2%88.2% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 17 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 17; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
34.4%34.4% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 180 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 180; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: URODYNAMICS: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
6 tests6 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
23 tests23 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
1 tests1 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
0 tests0 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
2 tests2 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
16 tests16 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
63 tests63 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
76 tests76 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
0 tests0 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
187 tests187 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
0 tests0 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: URODYNAMICS: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Patient-reported hip and knee outcomes
Patient-reported change after hip or knee replacement, adjusted by the publisher for the specified cohort.
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.9 EQ-5D Index points0.9 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Explore 105 additional measures
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
35 pairs35 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
38 pairs38 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
12.9 EQ VAS points12.9 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
73.7 EQ VAS points73.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
76.3 EQ VAS points76.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
66.7 EQ VAS points66.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
9.6 EQ VAS points9.6 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
23 pairs23 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
39 pairs39 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
22.3 Oxford Hip Score points22.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
39.8 Oxford Hip Score points39.8 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
41.3 Oxford Hip Score points41.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
20.3 Oxford Hip Score points20.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
21 Oxford Hip Score points21 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
38 pairs38 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
39 pairs39 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
36 pairs36 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
41 pairs41 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
8.3 EQ VAS points8.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
73.4 EQ VAS points73.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
78 EQ VAS points78 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
72.5 EQ VAS points72.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
5.5 EQ VAS points5.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
26 pairs26 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
41 pairs41 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
13.3 Oxford Knee Score points13.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
32.6 Oxford Knee Score points32.6 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
34.8 Oxford Knee Score points34.8 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
21.6 Oxford Knee Score points21.6 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
13.2 Oxford Knee Score points13.2 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
39 pairs39 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
41 pairs41 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.9 EQ-5D Index points0.9 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
35 pairs35 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
38 pairs38 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 38.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
12.3 EQ VAS points12.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
73.2 EQ VAS points73.2 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
76.3 EQ VAS points76.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
66.7 EQ VAS points66.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
9.6 EQ VAS points9.6 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
23 pairs23 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
39 pairs39 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
21.2 Oxford Hip Score points21.2 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
38.7 Oxford Hip Score points38.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
41.3 Oxford Hip Score points41.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
20.3 Oxford Hip Score points20.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
21 Oxford Hip Score points21 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
38 pairs38 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
39 pairs39 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 39.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
36 pairs36 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
41 pairs41 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
7.3 EQ VAS points7.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
72.3 EQ VAS points72.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
78 EQ VAS points78 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
72.5 EQ VAS points72.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
5.5 EQ VAS points5.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
26 pairs26 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
41 pairs41 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
13 Oxford Knee Score points13 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
32.3 Oxford Knee Score points32.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
34.8 Oxford Knee Score points34.8 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
21.6 Oxford Knee Score points21.6 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
13.2 Oxford Knee Score points13.2 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
39 pairs39 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
41 pairs41 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 41.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NVC02.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Hospital environment: PLACE assessments
Assessments of the hospital environment, separate from clinical outcomes.
2025 hospital site
Cleanliness assessment
99.4%99.4% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cleanliness assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Combined Food assessment
94.8%94.8% was reported for “Combined Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Combined Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
97.8%97.8% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
Explore 5 additional measures
2025 hospital site
Dementia assessment
89%89% was reported for “Dementia assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Dementia assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Disability assessment
88%88% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Disability assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Organisation Food assessment
92.9%92.9% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Organisation Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
95.7%95.7% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Ward Food assessment
97.2%97.2% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ward Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
About this service
- Recorded care types
- Hospitals
- Local authority area
- Reading
- Funding information
- Confirm directly with the provider
- Registered provider
- Ramsay Health Care UK Operations Limited
- Telephone in source record
- 01189028000
- NHS organisation code
- NVC02
- CQC identifier
- 1-128733141
Registered specialisms
- Caring for adults under 65 yrs
- Caring for adults over 65 yrs
These are specialisms in the regulatory record. They do not confirm that a particular treatment, assessment or place is currently available.
CQC inspection evidence
Keep the publication date and assessed service in view. Ratings are reproduced as categories; they are not averaged into a score.
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Safe | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Effective | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Caring | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Responsive | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Well-led | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Overall | Good | 19 May 2020 |
Ratings for specific services and population groups (22)
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic imaging Safe | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Diagnostic imaging Caring | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Diagnostic imaging Responsive | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Diagnostic imaging Well-led | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Diagnostic imaging Overall | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Safe | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Effective | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Caring | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Responsive | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Well-led | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Overall | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Outpatients Safe | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Outpatients Caring | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Outpatients Responsive | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Outpatients Well-led | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Outpatients Overall | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Surgery Safe | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Surgery Effective | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Surgery Caring | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Surgery Responsive | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Surgery Well-led | Good | 19 May 2020 |
| Surgery Overall | Good | 19 May 2020 |
Service evidence
- Urology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for urology serviceCheck official service information - Trauma and Orthopaedic ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for trauma and orthopaedic serviceCheck official service information - Gynaecology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for gynaecology serviceCheck official service information - General Surgery ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for general surgery serviceCheck official service information - Ophthalmology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for ophthalmology serviceCheck official service information - Plastic Surgery ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for plastic surgery serviceCheck official service information - Gastroenterology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for gastroenterology serviceCheck official service information - MRICurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for mriCheck official service information - CTCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for ctCheck official service information - NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUNDCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for non_obstetric_ultrasoundCheck official service information - DEXA_SCANCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for dexa_scanCheck official service information - PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYSCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for peripheral_neurophysCheck official service information - URODYNAMICSCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for urodynamicsCheck official service information - COLONOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for colonoscopyCheck official service information - FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for flexi_sigmoidoscopyCheck official service information - CYSTOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for cystoscopyCheck official service information - GASTROSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for gastroscopyCheck official service information
Regulated activities
- Diagnostic and screening procedures
- Family planning
- Surgical procedures
- Treatment of disease, disorder or injury
Connected organisations and services
- Ramsay Health Care UK Operations LimitedRegistered provider
Sources and coverage
- Care Quality Commission registerDirectory: 9 September 2026; detailed register: 1 September 2026 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
- Referral-to-treatment waiting times2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Diagnostic waiting times and activity2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement2024/25 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- PLACE: hospital environment assessments2025 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
Source changes may take time to appear here. Suggest a correction · Represent this provider
More options in Reading
Explore the areaCircleReading
Reading, RG2 0NE
Caring for adults under 65 yrs · Caring for adults over 65 yrs
View service detailsRoyal Berkshire Hospital
Reading, RG1 5AN
Hospital
View service detailsSpire Dunedin Hospital
Reading, RG1 6NS
Hospital · Clinic
View service details