Hospitals · Leeds
Spire Methley Park Hospital
Methley Lane, Methley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS26 9HG
MAKE YOUR VISIT EASIER
Contact, travel and your visit
Plan around the exact appointment location. The registered address can differ from the entrance or department you need.
Contact the service
01977518518Website and contact optionsNo verified public email address is included in this directory record. Use the service’s published contact route.
Opening and appointment times
Confirm today’s hours directly. Reception, telephone and individual clinic hours can differ.
Check current timesAccessibility and facilities
Check step-free access, accessible toilets, hearing support, interpreters and any help you need before travelling.
Ask about access arrangementsNearby places use the directory’s map reference point, which may be a postcode centre. Distances are approximate straight lines, not walking routes. Check the entrance, route and current arrangements.
Nearby transport stops
- WoodsideBus stopAbout under 100 m in a straight line
- Methley Pk HospitalBus stopAbout 300 m in a straight line
- Fleet LaneBus stopAbout 300 m in a straight line
- Woodlesford Rail StationRail stationAbout 2.2 km in a straight line
Bus stops within 1 km; rail and other access points within 3 km. A listed stop does not confirm a current timetable.
DfT NaPTAN · downloaded 10 September 2026 · Open Government Licence.
Mapped parking nearby
- Methely Ex-Services ClubMapped car parkAbout 1.4 km in a straight line
These are nearby mapped car parks, not confirmed visitor parking for this service. Check access restrictions, charges, hours and Blue Badge arrangements with the operator.
© OpenStreetMap contributors · 9 September 2026 · ODbL. Data and coverage.
What to expect and prepare
General planning guidance; your service’s instructions take priority. NHS hospital visit guidance · Travel and access checklist.
Questions about visiting Spire Methley Park Hospital
What are the opening and visiting times?
Verified opening hours are not included in this directory record. Check the service’s website or call 01977518518 before travelling. Individual wards can have different visiting arrangements.
Do I need an appointment or referral?
Contact the service to confirm the booking or referral route for the exact care you need. Published activity and waiting figures do not show current appointment availability.
Can I park here, and is there accessible parking?
Check the service’s current parking instructions. Nearby map listings are separate from on-site visitor parking; neither a map entry nor historical parking figures confirm a space, price or Blue Badge concession today.
How can I arrange help with access or communication?
Contact the service before your visit and explain the help you need. Ask about the exact entrance, step-free routes, toilets, hearing support or interpretation; facilities are not inferred from the type of service.
What can I learn about Spire Methley Park Hospital?
The recorded overall CQC rating is “Good”, dated 22 January 2024. Use the contact and visiting details above to check the service you need, then compare the dated evidence below.
UNDERSTAND YOUR OPTIONS
Care and access: the published picture
Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.
Referral-to-treatment pathways
How long treatment pathways had already been waiting at the reporting date. One person can have more than one pathway.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
86.9%Total
86.9% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 932 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 932; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
932 waiting-list entriesTotal
932 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
179 waiting-list entriesGeneral Surgery Service
179 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
Explore 32 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
19 waiting-list entriesUrology Service
19 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
687 waiting-list entriesTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
687 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
17 waiting-list entriesNeurosurgical Service
17 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
29 waiting-list entriesPlastic Surgery Service
29 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1 waiting-list entriesOther - Surgical Services
1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
92.2%General Surgery Service
92.2% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 179 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 179; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
94.7%Urology Service
94.7% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 19 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 19; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
85.3%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
85.3% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 687 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 687; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
94.1%Neurosurgical Service
94.1% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 17 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 17; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
82.8%Plastic Surgery Service
82.8% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 29 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 29; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
100%Other - Surgical Services
100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%General Surgery Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 179 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 179; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Urology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 19 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 19; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.2%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
0.2% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 687 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 687; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Neurosurgical Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 17 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 17; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Plastic Surgery Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 29 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 29; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.1%Total
0.1% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 932 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 932; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Other - Surgical Services
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
15 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
15 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
103 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
103 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
5 pathwaysUrology Service
5 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
6 pathwaysUrology Service
6 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
46 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
46 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
306 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
306 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Neurosurgical Service: completed admitted pathways
4 pathwaysNeurosurgical Service
4 pathways was reported for “Neurosurgical Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Neurosurgical Service: completed non-admitted pathways
3 pathwaysNeurosurgical Service
3 pathways was reported for “Neurosurgical Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Plastic Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
2 pathwaysPlastic Surgery Service
2 pathways was reported for “Plastic Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Plastic Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
11 pathwaysPlastic Surgery Service
11 pathways was reported for “Plastic Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Plastic Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Neurology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
5 pathwaysNeurology Service
5 pathways was reported for “Neurology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed admitted pathways
72 pathwaysTotal
72 pathways was reported for “Total: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed non-admitted pathways
435 pathwaysTotal
435 pathways was reported for “Total: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways
1 pathwaysOther - Surgical Services
1 pathways was reported for “Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
Diagnostic tests and waiting lists
Historical diagnostic waiting lists and completed test activity describe different groups.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
7 waiting-list entries7 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
6 waiting-list entries6 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
6 waiting-list entries6 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Explore 24 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
3 waiting-list entries3 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
0 waiting-list entries0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
17 waiting-list entries17 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
31 waiting-list entries31 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
0 waiting-list entries0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
70 waiting-list entries70 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 7 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 7; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 6 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 6; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 6 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 6; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
35.3%35.3% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 17 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 17; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
38.7%38.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 31 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 31; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
25.7%25.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 70 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 70; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
8 tests8 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
7 tests7 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
6 tests6 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
6 tests6 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
6 tests6 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
40 tests40 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
7 tests7 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
9 tests9 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
89 tests89 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Patient-reported hip and knee outcomes
Patient-reported change after hip or knee replacement, adjusted by the publisher for the specified cohort.
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Explore 105 additional measures
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
53 pairs53 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
58 pairs58 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
4 pairs4 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
17 EQ VAS points17 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
77.8 EQ VAS points77.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
78.8 EQ VAS points78.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
60.4 EQ VAS points60.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
18.4 EQ VAS points18.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
49 pairs49 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
58 pairs58 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
6 pairs6 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
24.1 Oxford Hip Score points24.1 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
41.6 Oxford Hip Score points41.6 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
42.3 Oxford Hip Score points42.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
16.7 Oxford Hip Score points16.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
25.6 Oxford Hip Score points25.6 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
58 pairs58 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
58 pairs58 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
54 pairs54 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
65 pairs65 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
4 pairs4 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
7 pairs7 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
10.5 EQ VAS points10.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
75.5 EQ VAS points75.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
76.4 EQ VAS points76.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
65.1 EQ VAS points65.1 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
11.3 EQ VAS points11.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
42 pairs42 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
65 pairs65 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
6 pairs6 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
17 pairs17 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
17.8 Oxford Knee Score points17.8 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
37.1 Oxford Knee Score points37.1 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
37.3 Oxford Knee Score points37.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
19.4 Oxford Knee Score points19.4 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
17.9 Oxford Knee Score points17.9 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
62 pairs62 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
65 pairs65 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
53 pairs53 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
58 pairs58 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
4 pairs4 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
17.2 EQ VAS points17.2 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
78.1 EQ VAS points78.1 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
78.8 EQ VAS points78.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
60.4 EQ VAS points60.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
18.4 EQ VAS points18.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
49 pairs49 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
58 pairs58 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
6 pairs6 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
24.1 Oxford Hip Score points24.1 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
41.6 Oxford Hip Score points41.6 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
42.3 Oxford Hip Score points42.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
16.7 Oxford Hip Score points16.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
25.6 Oxford Hip Score points25.6 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
58 pairs58 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
58 pairs58 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 58.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
54 pairs54 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
65 pairs65 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
4 pairs4 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
7 pairs7 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
10.5 EQ VAS points10.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
75.5 EQ VAS points75.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
76.4 EQ VAS points76.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
65.1 EQ VAS points65.1 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
11.3 EQ VAS points11.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
42 pairs42 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
65 pairs65 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
6 pairs6 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
17 pairs17 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
17.9 Oxford Knee Score points17.9 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
37.1 Oxford Knee Score points37.1 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
37.3 Oxford Knee Score points37.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
19.4 Oxford Knee Score points19.4 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
17.9 Oxford Knee Score points17.9 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
62 pairs62 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
65 pairs65 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
3 pairs3 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 65.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT350.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Hospital environment: PLACE assessments
Assessments of the hospital environment, separate from clinical outcomes.
2025 hospital site
Cleanliness assessment
100%100% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cleanliness assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Combined Food assessment
95.3%95.3% was reported for “Combined Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Combined Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
100%100% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
Explore 5 additional measures
2025 hospital site
Dementia assessment
93.8%93.8% was reported for “Dementia assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Dementia assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Disability assessment
92.3%92.3% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Disability assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Organisation Food assessment
91.8%91.8% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Organisation Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
85.1%85.1% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Ward Food assessment
100%100% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ward Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
About this service
- Recorded care types
- Hospitals
- Local authority area
- Leeds
- Funding information
- Confirm directly with the provider
- Registered provider
- Spire Healthcare Limited
- Telephone in source record
- 01977518518
- NHS organisation code
- NT350
- CQC identifier
- 1-2745185984
Registered specialisms
- Caring for adults under 65 yrs
- Caring for adults over 65 yrs
These are specialisms in the regulatory record. They do not confirm that a particular treatment, assessment or place is currently available.
CQC inspection evidence
Keep the publication date and assessed service in view. Ratings are reproduced as categories; they are not averaged into a score.
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Safe | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Effective | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Caring | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Responsive | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Well-led | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Overall | Good | 22 January 2024 |
Ratings for specific services and population groups (18)
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic imaging Safe | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Diagnostic imaging Effective | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Diagnostic imaging Caring | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Diagnostic imaging Responsive | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Diagnostic imaging Well-led | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Diagnostic imaging Overall | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Outpatients Safe | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Outpatients Effective | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Outpatients Caring | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Outpatients Responsive | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Outpatients Well-led | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Outpatients Overall | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Surgery Safe | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Surgery Effective | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Surgery Caring | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Surgery Responsive | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Surgery Well-led | Good | 22 January 2024 |
| Surgery Overall | Good | 22 January 2024 |
Service evidence
- Urology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for urology serviceCheck official service information - Trauma and Orthopaedic ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for trauma and orthopaedic serviceCheck official service information - Neurosurgical ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for neurosurgical serviceCheck official service information - General Surgery ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for general surgery serviceCheck official service information - Plastic Surgery ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for plastic surgery serviceCheck official service information - Other - Surgical ServicesCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for other - surgical servicesCheck official service information - MRICurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for mriCheck official service information - CTCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for ctCheck official service information - NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUNDCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for non_obstetric_ultrasoundCheck official service information - PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYSCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for peripheral_neurophysCheck official service information - COLONOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for colonoscopyCheck official service information - FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for flexi_sigmoidoscopyCheck official service information - CYSTOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for cystoscopyCheck official service information - GASTROSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for gastroscopyCheck official service information
Regulated activities
- Diagnostic and screening procedures
- Family planning
- Services in slimming clinics
- Surgical procedures
- Treatment of disease, disorder or injury
Connected organisations and services
- Spire Healthcare LimitedRegistered provider
Sources and coverage
- Care Quality Commission registerDirectory: 9 September 2026; detailed register: 1 September 2026 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
- Referral-to-treatment waiting times2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Diagnostic waiting times and activity2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement2024/25 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- PLACE: hospital environment assessments2025 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
Source changes may take time to appear here. Suggest a correction · Represent this provider
More options in Leeds
Explore the areaChapel Allerton Hospital
Leeds, LS7 4SA
Caring for adults under 65 yrs · Dementia · Caring for adults over 65 yrs
View service detailsDr. Raja Hair Restoration
Leeds, LS10 1AD
Caring for adults under 65 yrs · Caring for adults over 65 yrs
View service detailsLeeds Dental Institute
Leeds, LS2 9LU
Hospital · Dentist · Diagnosis/screening
View service detailsLeeds General Infirmary
Leeds, LS1 3EX
Hospital · Community services - Healthcare · Diagnosis/screening
View service details