Hospitals · Blackpool
Spire Fylde Coast Hospital
Fylde Coast Hospital, St Walburgas Road, Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8BP
MAKE YOUR VISIT EASIER
Contact, travel and your visit
Plan around the exact appointment location. The registered address can differ from the entrance or department you need.
Contact the service
Use the official contact page.
Website and contact optionsNo verified public email address is included in this directory record. Use the service’s published contact route.
Opening and appointment times
Confirm today’s hours directly. Reception, telephone and individual clinic hours can differ.
Check current timesAccessibility and facilities
Check step-free access, accessible toilets, hearing support, interpreters and any help you need before travelling.
Ask about access arrangementsNearby places use the directory’s map reference point, which may be a postcode centre. Distances are approximate straight lines, not walking routes. Check the entrance, route and current arrangements.
Nearby transport stops
- St. Mary's SchoolBus stop · outsideAbout under 100 m in a straight line
- St Walburgas RoadBus stop · byAbout 100 m in a straight line
- St. Mary's SchoolBus stop · oppositeAbout 200 m in a straight line
- Layton (Lancs) Rail StationRail station entrance · entranceAbout 1.2 km in a straight line
- Rail StationRail station entrance · EntranceAbout 1.3 km in a straight line
Bus stops within 1 km; rail and other access points within 3 km. A listed stop does not confirm a current timetable.
DfT NaPTAN · downloaded 10 September 2026 · Open Government Licence.
Mapped parking nearby
- Victoria Hospital MultistoreyMapped car parkAbout 700 m in a straight line
- Blackpool ZooMapped car parkAbout 1.3 km in a straight line
These are nearby mapped car parks, not confirmed visitor parking for this service. Check access restrictions, charges, hours and Blue Badge arrangements with the operator.
© OpenStreetMap contributors · 9 September 2026 · ODbL. Data and coverage.
What to expect and prepare
General planning guidance; your service’s instructions take priority. NHS hospital visit guidance · Travel and access checklist.
Questions about visiting Spire Fylde Coast Hospital
What are the opening and visiting times?
Verified opening hours are not included in this directory record. Check the service’s website before travelling. Individual wards can have different visiting arrangements.
Do I need an appointment or referral?
Contact the service to confirm the booking or referral route for the exact care you need. Published activity and waiting figures do not show current appointment availability.
Can I park here, and is there accessible parking?
Check the service’s current parking instructions. Nearby map listings are separate from on-site visitor parking; neither a map entry nor historical parking figures confirm a space, price or Blue Badge concession today.
How can I arrange help with access or communication?
Contact the service before your visit and explain the help you need. Ask about the exact entrance, step-free routes, toilets, hearing support or interpretation; facilities are not inferred from the type of service.
What can I learn about Spire Fylde Coast Hospital?
The recorded overall CQC rating is “Good”, dated 2 September 2019. Use the contact and visiting details above to check the service you need, then compare the dated evidence below.
UNDERSTAND YOUR OPTIONS
Care and access: the published picture
Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.
Referral-to-treatment pathways
How long treatment pathways had already been waiting at the reporting date. One person can have more than one pathway.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
66.6%Total
66.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 2,998 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 2,998; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
2,998 waiting-list entriesTotal
2,998 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
395 waiting-list entriesGeneral Surgery Service
395 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
Explore 49 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
144 waiting-list entriesUrology Service
144 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1,983 waiting-list entriesTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
1,983 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
111 waiting-list entriesEar Nose and Throat Service
111 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
76 waiting-list entriesNeurosurgical Service
76 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1 waiting-list entriesGeneral Internal Medicine Service
1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Internal Medicine Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
4 waiting-list entriesGastroenterology Service
4 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1 waiting-list entriesCardiology Service
1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cardiology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
1 waiting-list entriesNeurology Service
1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
266 waiting-list entriesGynaecology Service
266 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
16 waiting-list entriesOther - Surgical Services
16 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
80.3%General Surgery Service
80.3% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 395 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 395; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
81.3%Urology Service
81.3% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 144 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 144; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
63%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
63% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1,983 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1,983; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
76.6%Ear Nose and Throat Service
76.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 111 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 111; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
19.7%Neurosurgical Service
19.7% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 76 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 76; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
100%General Internal Medicine Service
100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Internal Medicine Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
50%Gastroenterology Service
50% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 4 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 4; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
100%Cardiology Service
100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cardiology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
100%Neurology Service
100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
72.6%Gynaecology Service
72.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 266 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 266; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
93.8%Other - Surgical Services
93.8% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 16 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 16; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%General Surgery Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 395 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 395; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Urology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 144 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 144; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.1%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
0.1% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1,983 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1,983; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Ear Nose and Throat Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 111 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 111; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Neurosurgical Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 76 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 76; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%General Internal Medicine Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Internal Medicine Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Gastroenterology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 4 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 4; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Cardiology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cardiology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Neurology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Gynaecology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 266 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 266; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0.1%Total
0.1% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 2,998 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 2,998; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Other - Surgical Services
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 16 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 16; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
64 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
64 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
48 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
48 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
6 pathwaysUrology Service
6 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
30 pathwaysUrology Service
30 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
246 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
246 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
284 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
284 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways
12 pathwaysEar Nose and Throat Service
12 pathways was reported for “Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed non-admitted pathways
112 pathwaysEar Nose and Throat Service
112 pathways was reported for “Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Neurosurgical Service: completed non-admitted pathways
2 pathwaysNeurosurgical Service
2 pathways was reported for “Neurosurgical Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Neurosurgical Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways
2 pathwaysGastroenterology Service
2 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
3 pathwaysGastroenterology Service
3 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
22 pathwaysGynaecology Service
22 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
73 pathwaysGynaecology Service
73 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed admitted pathways
352 pathwaysTotal
352 pathways was reported for “Total: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed non-admitted pathways
555 pathwaysTotal
555 pathways was reported for “Total: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways
3 pathwaysOther - Surgical Services
3 pathways was reported for “Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
Diagnostic tests and waiting lists
Historical diagnostic waiting lists and completed test activity describe different groups.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
0 waiting-list entries0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
17 waiting-list entries17 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
3 waiting-list entries3 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Explore 27 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
0 waiting-list entries0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
1 waiting-list entries1 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
2 waiting-list entries2 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
54 waiting-list entries54 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
56 waiting-list entries56 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
0 waiting-list entries0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
133 waiting-list entries133 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 17 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 17; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 3 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 3; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 2 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 2; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
5.6%5.6% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 54 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 54; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
5.4%5.4% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 56 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 56; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
4.5%4.5% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 133 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 133; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
2 tests2 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
40 tests40 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
13 tests13 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
1 tests1 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
0 tests0 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
1 tests1 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
98 tests98 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
70 tests70 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
33 tests33 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
258 tests258 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Patient-reported hip and knee outcomes
Patient-reported change after hip or knee replacement, adjusted by the publisher for the specified cohort.
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Explore 105 additional measures
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
55 pairs55 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
71 pairs71 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
9 pairs9 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
7 pairs7 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
12.3 EQ VAS points12.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
73.1 EQ VAS points73.1 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
74.7 EQ VAS points74.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
66.9 EQ VAS points66.9 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
7.8 EQ VAS points7.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
48 pairs48 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
71 pairs71 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
9 pairs9 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
22.6 Oxford Hip Score points22.6 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
40 Oxford Hip Score points40 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
40.7 Oxford Hip Score points40.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
20.4 Oxford Hip Score points20.4 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
20.3 Oxford Hip Score points20.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
69 pairs69 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
71 pairs71 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.7 EQ-5D Index points0.7 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.7 EQ-5D Index points0.7 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
92 pairs92 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
120 pairs120 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
16 pairs16 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
12 pairs12 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
6.6 EQ VAS points6.6 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
71.6 EQ VAS points71.6 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
73.5 EQ VAS points73.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
67.8 EQ VAS points67.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
5.7 EQ VAS points5.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
64 pairs64 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
120 pairs120 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
18 pairs18 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
38 pairs38 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
16.4 Oxford Knee Score points16.4 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
35.7 Oxford Knee Score points35.7 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
36.2 Oxford Knee Score points36.2 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
19.9 Oxford Knee Score points19.9 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
16.3 Oxford Knee Score points16.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
115 pairs115 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
120 pairs120 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
5 pairs5 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
55 pairs55 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
71 pairs71 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
9 pairs9 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
7 pairs7 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
13 EQ VAS points13 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
73.9 EQ VAS points73.9 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
74.7 EQ VAS points74.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
66.9 EQ VAS points66.9 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
7.8 EQ VAS points7.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
48 pairs48 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
71 pairs71 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
9 pairs9 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
22.8 Oxford Hip Score points22.8 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
40.4 Oxford Hip Score points40.4 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
40.7 Oxford Hip Score points40.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
20.4 Oxford Hip Score points20.4 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
20.3 Oxford Hip Score points20.3 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
69 pairs69 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
71 pairs71 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
2 pairs2 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 71.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.7 EQ-5D Index points0.7 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.7 EQ-5D Index points0.7 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
92 pairs92 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
120 pairs120 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
16 pairs16 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
12 pairs12 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
7 EQ VAS points7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
72 EQ VAS points72 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
73.5 EQ VAS points73.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
67.8 EQ VAS points67.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
5.7 EQ VAS points5.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
64 pairs64 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
120 pairs120 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
18 pairs18 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
38 pairs38 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
16.3 Oxford Knee Score points16.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
35.5 Oxford Knee Score points35.5 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
36.2 Oxford Knee Score points36.2 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
19.9 Oxford Knee Score points19.9 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
16.3 Oxford Knee Score points16.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
115 pairs115 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
120 pairs120 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
0 pairs0 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
5 pairs5 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 120.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NT347.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Hospital environment: PLACE assessments
Assessments of the hospital environment, separate from clinical outcomes.
2025 hospital site
Cleanliness assessment
100%100% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cleanliness assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Combined Food assessment
97.1%97.1% was reported for “Combined Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Combined Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
100%100% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
Explore 5 additional measures
2025 hospital site
Dementia assessment
86.7%86.7% was reported for “Dementia assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Dementia assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Disability assessment
90%90% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Disability assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Organisation Food assessment
94.7%94.7% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Organisation Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
82.2%82.2% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Ward Food assessment
100%100% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ward Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
About this service
- Recorded care types
- Hospitals
- Local authority area
- Blackpool
- Funding information
- Confirm directly with the provider
- Registered provider
- Spire Healthcare Limited
- NHS organisation code
- NT347
- CQC identifier
- 1-2745681065
Registered specialisms
- Caring for adults under 65 yrs
- Caring for adults over 65 yrs
These are specialisms in the regulatory record. They do not confirm that a particular treatment, assessment or place is currently available.
CQC inspection evidence
Keep the publication date and assessed service in view. Ratings are reproduced as categories; they are not averaged into a score.
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Safe | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Effective | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Caring | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Responsive | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Well-led | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Overall | Good | 2 September 2019 |
Ratings for specific services and population groups (16)
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic imaging Safe | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Diagnostic imaging Caring | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Diagnostic imaging Responsive | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Diagnostic imaging Well-led | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Diagnostic imaging Overall | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Outpatients Safe | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Outpatients Caring | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Outpatients Responsive | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Outpatients Well-led | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Outpatients Overall | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Surgery Safe | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Surgery Effective | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Surgery Caring | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Surgery Responsive | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Surgery Well-led | Good | 2 September 2019 |
| Surgery Overall | Good | 2 September 2019 |
Service evidence
- Trauma and Orthopaedic ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for trauma and orthopaedic serviceCheck official service information - Other - Surgical ServicesCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for other - surgical servicesCheck official service information - General Surgery ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for general surgery serviceCheck official service information - Urology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for urology serviceCheck official service information - Ear Nose and Throat ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for ear nose and throat serviceCheck official service information - Neurosurgical ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for neurosurgical serviceCheck official service information - General Internal Medicine ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for general internal medicine serviceCheck official service information - Gastroenterology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for gastroenterology serviceCheck official service information - Neurology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for neurology serviceCheck official service information - Gynaecology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for gynaecology serviceCheck official service information - Cardiology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for cardiology serviceCheck official service information - MRICurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for mriCheck official service information - CTCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for ctCheck official service information - NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUNDCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for non_obstetric_ultrasoundCheck official service information - ECHOCARDIOGRAPHYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for echocardiographyCheck official service information - PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYSCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for peripheral_neurophysCheck official service information - COLONOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for colonoscopyCheck official service information - FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for flexi_sigmoidoscopyCheck official service information - CYSTOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for cystoscopyCheck official service information - GASTROSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for gastroscopyCheck official service information
Regulated activities
- Diagnostic and screening procedures
- Services in slimming clinics
- Surgical procedures
- Treatment of disease, disorder or injury
Connected organisations and services
- Spire Healthcare LimitedRegistered provider
Sources and coverage
- Care Quality Commission registerDirectory: 9 September 2026; detailed register: 1 September 2026 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
- Referral-to-treatment waiting times2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Diagnostic waiting times and activity2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement2024/25 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- PLACE: hospital environment assessments2025 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
Source changes may take time to appear here. Suggest a correction · Represent this provider
More options in Blackpool
Explore the areaBlackpool Victoria Hospital
Blackpool, FY3 8NR
Hospital · Blood and transplant service · Community services - Healthcare
View service details