Hospitals · South Gloucestershire
Practice Plus Group Hospital - Emersons Green
The Brooms, Emersons Green, Bristol, BS16 7FH
MAKE YOUR VISIT EASIER
Contact, travel and your visit
Plan around the exact appointment location. The registered address can differ from the entrance or department you need.
Contact the service
01206752552Website and contact optionsNo verified public email address is included in this directory record. Use the service’s published contact route.
Opening and appointment times
Confirm today’s hours directly. Reception, telephone and individual clinic hours can differ.
Check current timesAccessibility and facilities
Check step-free access, accessible toilets, hearing support, interpreters and any help you need before travelling.
Ask about access arrangementsNearby places use the directory’s map reference point, which may be a postcode centre. Distances are approximate straight lines, not walking routes. Check the entrance, route and current arrangements.
Nearby transport stops
- Treatment CentreBus stop · E-boundAbout under 100 m in a straight line
- Willy WicketBus stop · AAbout 400 m in a straight line
- Wick WickBus stop · S-boundAbout 400 m in a straight line
Bus stops within 1 km; rail and other access points within 3 km. A listed stop does not confirm a current timetable.
DfT NaPTAN · downloaded 10 September 2026 · Open Government Licence.
Mapped parking nearby
- Some place to sleepMapped car parkAbout 1.3 km in a straight line
These are nearby mapped car parks, not confirmed visitor parking for this service. Check access restrictions, charges, hours and Blue Badge arrangements with the operator.
© OpenStreetMap contributors · 9 September 2026 · ODbL. Data and coverage.
What to expect and prepare
General planning guidance; your service’s instructions take priority. NHS hospital visit guidance · Travel and access checklist.
Questions about visiting Practice Plus Group Hospital - Emersons Green
What are the opening and visiting times?
Verified opening hours are not included in this directory record. Check the service’s website or call 01206752552 before travelling. Individual wards can have different visiting arrangements.
Do I need an appointment or referral?
Contact the service to confirm the booking or referral route for the exact care you need. Published activity and waiting figures do not show current appointment availability.
Can I park here, and is there accessible parking?
Check the service’s current parking instructions. Nearby map listings are separate from on-site visitor parking; neither a map entry nor historical parking figures confirm a space, price or Blue Badge concession today.
How can I arrange help with access or communication?
Contact the service before your visit and explain the help you need. Ask about the exact entrance, step-free routes, toilets, hearing support or interpretation; facilities are not inferred from the type of service.
What can I learn about Practice Plus Group Hospital - Emersons Green?
The recorded overall CQC rating is “Good”, dated 22 July 2016. Use the contact and visiting details above to check the service you need, then compare the dated evidence below.
UNDERSTAND YOUR OPTIONS
Care and access: the published picture
Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.
Referral-to-treatment pathways
How long treatment pathways had already been waiting at the reporting date. One person can have more than one pathway.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
78.4%Total
78.4% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 5,808 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 5,808; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
5,808 waiting-list entriesTotal
5,808 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
262 waiting-list entriesGeneral Surgery Service
262 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
Explore 42 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
50 waiting-list entriesUrology Service
50 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
888 waiting-list entriesTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
888 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
233 waiting-list entriesEar Nose and Throat Service
233 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
357 waiting-list entriesOphthalmology Service
357 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
3,195 waiting-list entriesOral Surgery Service
3,195 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
549 waiting-list entriesGastroenterology Service
549 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Still on the waiting list
274 waiting-list entriesGynaecology Service
274 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
85.1%General Surgery Service
85.1% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 262 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 262; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
98%Urology Service
98% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 50 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 50; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
89.5%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
89.5% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 888 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 888; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
90.1%Ear Nose and Throat Service
90.1% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 233 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 233; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
95%Ophthalmology Service
95% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 357 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 357; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
67.4%Oral Surgery Service
67.4% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 3,195 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 3,195; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
100%Gastroenterology Service
100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 549 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 549; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
85%Gynaecology Service
85% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 274 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 274; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%General Surgery Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 262 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 262; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Urology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 50 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 50; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Trauma and Orthopaedic Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 888 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 888; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Ear Nose and Throat Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 233 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 233; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Ophthalmology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 357 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 357; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Oral Surgery Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 3,195 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 3,195; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Gastroenterology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 549 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 549; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Gynaecology Service
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 274 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 274; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting over a year
0%Total
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 5,808 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 5,808; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
47 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
47 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
41 pathwaysGeneral Surgery Service
41 pathways was reported for “General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: General Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
19 pathwaysUrology Service
19 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
9 pathwaysUrology Service
9 pathways was reported for “Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Urology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
165 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
165 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
57 pathwaysTrauma and Orthopaedic Service
57 pathways was reported for “Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways
22 pathwaysEar Nose and Throat Service
22 pathways was reported for “Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed non-admitted pathways
18 pathwaysEar Nose and Throat Service
18 pathways was reported for “Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways
168 pathwaysOphthalmology Service
168 pathways was reported for “Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Ophthalmology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
53 pathwaysOphthalmology Service
53 pathways was reported for “Ophthalmology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Oral Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
470 pathwaysOral Surgery Service
470 pathways was reported for “Oral Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Oral Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
209 pathwaysOral Surgery Service
209 pathways was reported for “Oral Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Oral Surgery Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways
349 pathwaysGastroenterology Service
349 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
119 pathwaysGastroenterology Service
119 pathways was reported for “Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gastroenterology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
22 pathwaysGynaecology Service
22 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
17 pathwaysGynaecology Service
17 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed admitted pathways
1,262 pathwaysTotal
1,262 pathways was reported for “Total: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Total: completed non-admitted pathways
523 pathwaysTotal
523 pathways was reported for “Total: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
Diagnostic tests and waiting lists
Historical diagnostic waiting lists and completed test activity describe different groups.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
134 waiting-list entries134 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
19 waiting-list entries19 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
1 waiting-list entries1 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Explore 24 additional measures
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
8 waiting-list entries8 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
31 waiting-list entries31 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
307 waiting-list entries307 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
7 waiting-list entries7 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
95 waiting-list entries95 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
602 waiting-list entries602 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
6.7%6.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 134 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 134; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
47.4%47.4% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 19 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 19; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
0%0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
37.5%37.5% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 8 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 8; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
9.7%9.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 31 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 31; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
3.3%3.3% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 307 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 307; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
71.4%71.4% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 7 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 7; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
8.4%8.4% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 95 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 95; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 6 weeks or longer
7.8%7.8% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 602 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 602; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
197 tests197 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
91 tests91 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
2 tests2 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
6 tests6 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
53 tests53 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
267 tests267 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
58 tests58 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
109 tests109 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Tests recorded during the month
783 tests783 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
Patient-reported hip and knee outcomes
Patient-reported change after hip or knee replacement, adjusted by the publisher for the specified cohort.
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.5 EQ-5D Index points0.5 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Explore 105 additional measures
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
145 pairs145 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
165 pairs165 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
6 pairs6 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
16.4 EQ VAS points16.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
77.3 EQ VAS points77.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
79.7 EQ VAS points79.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
65.3 EQ VAS points65.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
14.4 EQ VAS points14.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
111 pairs111 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
159 pairs159 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
12 pairs12 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
36 pairs36 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
21.8 Oxford Hip Score points21.8 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
39.2 Oxford Hip Score points39.2 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
40.7 Oxford Hip Score points40.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
19.7 Oxford Hip Score points19.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
21 Oxford Hip Score points21 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
159 pairs159 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
167 pairs167 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
7 pairs7 pairs was reported for “Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hip Replacement Primary · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
187 pairs187 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
218 pairs218 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
15 pairs15 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
16 pairs16 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
10.5 EQ VAS points10.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
75.5 EQ VAS points75.5 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
78.4 EQ VAS points78.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
69.8 EQ VAS points69.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
8.6 EQ VAS points8.6 EQ VAS points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
137 pairs137 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
209 pairs209 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
9 pairs9 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
63 pairs63 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
16.3 Oxford Knee Score points16.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
35.6 Oxford Knee Score points35.6 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
37 Oxford Knee Score points37 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
20.9 Oxford Knee Score points20.9 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
16.1 Oxford Knee Score points16.1 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
210 pairs210 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
222 pairs222 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
11 pairs11 pairs was reported for “Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Knee Replacement Primary · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
145 pairs145 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
165 pairs165 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
14 pairs14 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
6 pairs6 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 165.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
15.4 EQ VAS points15.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
76.3 EQ VAS points76.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
79.7 EQ VAS points79.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
65.3 EQ VAS points65.3 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
14.4 EQ VAS points14.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
111 pairs111 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
159 pairs159 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
12 pairs12 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
36 pairs36 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 159.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
20.7 Oxford Hip Score points20.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
38.2 Oxford Hip Score points38.2 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
40.7 Oxford Hip Score points40.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
19.7 Oxford Hip Score points19.7 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
21 Oxford Hip Score points21 Oxford Hip Score points was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
159 pairs159 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
167 pairs167 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
7 pairs7 pairs was reported for “Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Hip Replacement · Oxford Hip Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 167.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
0.7 EQ-5D Index points0.7 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
0.8 EQ-5D Index points0.8 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
0.4 EQ-5D Index points0.4 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
0.3 EQ-5D Index points0.3 EQ-5D Index points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
187 pairs187 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
218 pairs218 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
15 pairs15 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
16 pairs16 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ-5D Index: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 218.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
9.7 EQ VAS points9.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
74.7 EQ VAS points74.7 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
78.4 EQ VAS points78.4 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
69.8 EQ VAS points69.8 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
8.6 EQ VAS points8.6 EQ VAS points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
137 pairs137 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
209 pairs209 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
9 pairs9 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
63 pairs63 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · EQ VAS: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 209.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
16.1 Oxford Knee Score points16.1 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted health gain
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
35.3 Oxford Knee Score points35.3 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Case-mix-adjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
37 Oxford Knee Score points37 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted postoperative score
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
20.9 Oxford Knee Score points20.9 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted preoperative score
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
16.1 Oxford Knee Score points16.1 Oxford Knee Score points was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Unadjusted health gain
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
210 pairs210 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with improvement
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
222 pairs222 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Modelled questionnaire pairs
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
1 pairs1 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with unchanged score
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
2024/25 reporting provider
Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
11 pairs11 pairs was reported for “Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration”. Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total Knee Replacement · Oxford Knee Score: Questionnaire pairs with deterioration
Reported sample: 222.
Published NHS-funded hip or knee replacement questionnaire aggregates for April 2024–March 2025. Primary and revision procedures and the different questionnaires are separate cohorts. Results describe respondents with modelled questionnaire pairs, not every surgical patient or a personal prediction. Adjusted scores account for measured case mix; small differences do not establish statistically significant differences. Case-mix-adjusted results are withheld below 30 modelled pairs. Negative health gains and EQ-5D scores can be valid. Source reporting code: NTPH2.
Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement · Coverage and method
Hospital environment: PLACE assessments
Assessments of the hospital environment, separate from clinical outcomes.
2025 hospital site
Cleanliness assessment
100%100% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cleanliness assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Combined Food assessment
96.6%96.6% was reported for “Combined Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Combined Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
100%100% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
Explore 5 additional measures
2025 hospital site
Dementia assessment
99.7%99.7% was reported for “Dementia assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Dementia assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Disability assessment
99%99% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Disability assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Organisation Food assessment
94%94% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Organisation Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
100%100% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Ward Food assessment
100%100% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ward Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
About this service
- Recorded care types
- Hospitals
- Local authority area
- South Gloucestershire
- Funding information
- Confirm directly with the provider
- Registered provider
- Practice Plus Group Hospitals Limited
- Telephone in source record
- 01206752552
- NHS organisation code
- NTPH2
- CQC identifier
- 1-2251815469
Registered specialisms
- Caring for children (0 - 18yrs)
- Caring for adults under 65 yrs
- Caring for adults over 65 yrs
These are specialisms in the regulatory record. They do not confirm that a particular treatment, assessment or place is currently available.
CQC inspection evidence
Keep the publication date and assessed service in view. Ratings are reproduced as categories; they are not averaged into a score.
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Safe | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Effective | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Caring | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Responsive | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Well-led | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Overall | Good | 22 July 2016 |
Ratings for specific services and population groups (11)
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Safe | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Caring | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Responsive | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Well-led | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Overall | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Surgery Safe | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Surgery Effective | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Surgery Caring | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Surgery Responsive | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Surgery Well-led | Good | 22 July 2016 |
| Surgery Overall | Good | 22 July 2016 |
Service evidence
- General Surgery ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for general surgery serviceCheck official service information - Urology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for urology serviceCheck official service information - Trauma and Orthopaedic ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for trauma and orthopaedic serviceCheck official service information - Ear Nose and Throat ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for ear nose and throat serviceCheck official service information - Gastroenterology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for gastroenterology serviceCheck official service information - Oral Surgery ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for oral surgery serviceCheck official service information - Gynaecology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for gynaecology serviceCheck official service information - Ophthalmology ServiceCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical provider-level pathway evidence. Confirm the referral route, service location and current offer.
Compare reporting providers for ophthalmology serviceCheck official service information - MRICurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for mriCheck official service information - CTCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for ctCheck official service information - NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUNDCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for non_obstetric_ultrasoundCheck official service information - ECHOCARDIOGRAPHYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for echocardiographyCheck official service information - COLONOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for colonoscopyCheck official service information - FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for flexi_sigmoidoscopyCheck official service information - CYSTOSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for cystoscopyCheck official service information - GASTROSCOPYCurrent availability not confirmed · Checked 31 July 2026
Historical diagnostic reporting, not confirmation that tests can be booked at each location.
Compare reporting providers for gastroscopyCheck official service information
Regulated activities
- Diagnostic and screening procedures
- Surgical procedures
- Treatment of disease, disorder or injury
Connected organisations and services
- Practice Plus Group Hospitals LimitedRegistered provider
Sources and coverage
- Care Quality Commission registerDirectory: 9 September 2026; detailed register: 1 September 2026 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
- Referral-to-treatment waiting times2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Diagnostic waiting times and activity2026-07 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures: hip and knee replacement2024/25 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- PLACE: hospital environment assessments2025 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
Source changes may take time to appear here. Suggest a correction · Represent this provider
More options in South Gloucestershire
Explore the areaNorth Bristol Private Hospital
Bristol, BS32 4UB
Caring for adults under 65 yrs · Caring for adults over 65 yrs
View service detailsThe Northwood Hospital
Bristol, BS34 8YU
Caring for adults under 65 yrs · Caring for adults over 65 yrs
View service details