What can I learn about Liverpool Women'S NHS Foundation Trust?
The recorded overall CQC rating is “Requires improvement”, dated 23 June 2023. These figures describe an organisation or network; check which service and location would handle your care.
Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.
Inpatient experience across this trust
Patients’ survey responses across the trust. These can include several hospital sites.
2025 survey NHS trust
Patients’ overall hospital experience
8.9 out of 10
8.9 out of 10 was reported for “Patients’ overall hospital experience”. Adult inpatients’ reported experience, scored out of 10 and adjusted by the publisher for age, sex and admission route. Higher scores mean more positive experiences; small differences do not establish a better hospital.
Definition and source
Published measure: Overall experience
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.6–8.8 out of 10.
9.3 out of 10 was reported for “Being treated with respect and dignity”. Adult inpatients’ reported experience of respect and dignity, scored out of 10. This describes the survey group and reporting unit shown, rather than every patient’s care.
Definition and source
Published measure: Respect and dignity
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.7–9.6 out of 10.
If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?
8.5 out of 10
8.5 out of 10 was reported for “If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?
Reported sample: 144.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.3–9.1 out of 10.
Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?
9.4 out of 10
9.4 out of 10 was reported for “Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?
Reported sample: 63.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Much better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.4–8.8 out of 10.
Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.
5.8 out of 10
5.8 out of 10 was reported for “Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.
Reported sample: 95.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.6–8.3 out of 10.
During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?
9.8 out of 10
9.8 out of 10 was reported for “During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?
Reported sample: 211.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 9.1–9.7 out of 10.
When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?
9.1 out of 10
9.1 out of 10 was reported for “When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?
Reported sample: 214.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.1–9.3 out of 10.
Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?
9.1 out of 10
9.1 out of 10 was reported for “Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?
Reported sample: 221.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.5–9.7 out of 10.
When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?
9.1 out of 10
9.1 out of 10 was reported for “When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?
Reported sample: 219.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.1–9.5 out of 10.
When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?
9.1 out of 10
9.1 out of 10 was reported for “When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?
Reported sample: 208.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8–9.4 out of 10.
Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?
9.2 out of 10
9.2 out of 10 was reported for “Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?
Reported sample: 221.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.4–9.5 out of 10.
When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?
9 out of 10
9 out of 10 was reported for “When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?
Reported sample: 219.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8–9.5 out of 10.
How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?
7 out of 10
7 out of 10 was reported for “How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?
Reported sample: 168.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6–7.9 out of 10.
In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?
8 out of 10
8 out of 10 was reported for “In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?
Reported sample: 221.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.7–8.5 out of 10.
Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?
8.6 out of 10
8.6 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?
Reported sample: 199.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.1–8.5 out of 10.
To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?
8.2 out of 10
8.2 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?
Reported sample: 217.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.6–7.9 out of 10.
How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?
9 out of 10
9 out of 10 was reported for “How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?
Reported sample: 218.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.3–9.5 out of 10.
Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?
8.3 out of 10
8.3 out of 10 was reported for “Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?
Reported sample: 199.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7–8.6 out of 10.
Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?
9.7 out of 10
9.7 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?
Reported sample: 220.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 9.2–9.7 out of 10.
Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?
8.5 out of 10
8.5 out of 10 was reported for “Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?
Reported sample: 206.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.8–9.9 out of 10.
Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?
8.6 out of 10
8.6 out of 10 was reported for “Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?
Reported sample: 207.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.6–9 out of 10.
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)
Not reported
There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP).
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)
9.6 out of 10
9.6 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)
Reported sample: 37.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Much better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.4–8.8 out of 10.
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)
Not reported
There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP).
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)
9.1 out of 10
9.1 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)
Reported sample: 46.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.4–9.5 out of 10.
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)
8.7 out of 10
8.7 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)
Reported sample: 48.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.9–8.9 out of 10.
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)
4.9 out of 10
4.9 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)
Reported sample: 45.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 3.5–9.1 out of 10.
Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?
Not reported
There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP).
Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?
Not reported
There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP).
To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?
8.1 out of 10
8.1 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?
Reported sample: 217.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Much better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6–7.4 out of 10.
To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?
5.6 out of 10
5.6 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?
Reported sample: 139.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.4–7.2 out of 10.
Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?
8.2 out of 10
8.2 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?
Reported sample: 51.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.8–9.8 out of 10.
Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?
8.2 out of 10
8.2 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?
Reported sample: 220.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Much better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.2–7.7 out of 10.
Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.
9.5 out of 10
9.5 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.
Reported sample: 213.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Much better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.3–8.6 out of 10.
To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?
9.3 out of 10
9.3 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?
Reported sample: 196.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.6–9.3 out of 10.
Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?
7.7 out of 10
7.7 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?
Reported sample: 139.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.2–7.4 out of 10.
Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?
4.9 out of 10
4.9 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?
Reported sample: 187.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 3.5–5.5 out of 10.
How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.
7.8 out of 10
7.8 out of 10 was reported for “How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.
Reported sample: 169.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7–8.3 out of 10.
Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?
7.2 out of 10
7.2 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?
Reported sample: 204.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.8–7.6 out of 10.
Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?
9.3 out of 10
9.3 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?
Reported sample: 217.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Much better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.9–8.5 out of 10.
Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.
7.8 out of 10
7.8 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.
Reported sample: 69.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.8–10 out of 10.
After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.
5.2 out of 10
5.2 out of 10 was reported for “After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.
Reported sample: 103.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.8–7.9 out of 10.
Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?
9 out of 10
9 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?
Reported sample: 221.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.4–9.7 out of 10.
Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?
9.3 out of 10
9.3 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?
Reported sample: 220.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.7–9.6 out of 10.
Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.
8.9 out of 10
8.9 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.
Reported sample: 221.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.6–8.8 out of 10.
How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?
7.9 out of 10
7.9 out of 10 was reported for “How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?
Reported sample: 216.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.6–8.1 out of 10.
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients
7.8 out of 10
7.8 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients
Reported sample: 217.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.3–7.8 out of 10.
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff
9.2 out of 10
9.2 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff
Reported sample: 217.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.8–9.1 out of 10.
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting
9.6 out of 10
9.6 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting
Reported sample: 217.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Much better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8–8.8 out of 10.
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature
9.4 out of 10
9.4 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature
Reported sample: 217.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.6–9.6 out of 10.
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping
4.6 out of 10
4.6 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping
Reported sample: 217.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 2.4–5.4 out of 10.
How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?
9.4 out of 10
9.4 out of 10 was reported for “How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?
Reported sample: 216.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.4–9.4 out of 10.
Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?
8.8 out of 10
8.8 out of 10 was reported for “Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?
Reported sample: 154.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.4–9 out of 10.
7.5 out of 10 was reported for “Admission to hospital”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Admission to hospital
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.2–8.1 out of 10.
9 out of 10 was reported for “Kindness and compassion”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Kindness and compassion
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.4–9.7 out of 10.
8.3 out of 10 was reported for “The hospital and ward”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: The hospital and ward
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7–8.1 out of 10.
8.5 out of 10 was reported for “Basic needs”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Basic needs
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.3–8.8 out of 10.
9.1 out of 10 was reported for “Doctors”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Doctors
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.4–9.3 out of 10.
8.8 out of 10 was reported for “Nurses”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Nurses
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8–9 out of 10.
8.7 out of 10 was reported for “Your care and treatment”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Your care and treatment
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.9–8.8 out of 10.
There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Individual needs
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP).
There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Virtual wards
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP).
7.6 out of 10 was reported for “Leaving hospital”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Leaving hospital
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.1–7.9 out of 10.
For your decision Check whether a site-level survey is also available for the hospital you would attend.
Referral-to-treatment pathways
How long treatment pathways had already been waiting at the reporting date. One person can have more than one pathway.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Already waiting 18 weeks or less
63.9%
Total
63.9% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 11,643 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 11,643; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
11,643 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
10,362 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
1,281 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
62.3% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 10,362 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 10,362; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
77.1% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.
Based on 1,281 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1,281; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.
1% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 10,362 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 10,362; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
0.9% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 11,643 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 11,643; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.
Based on 1,281 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks
The calculation uses a denominator of 1,281; see the source for the eligible group.
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.
227 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
2,458 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
257 pathways was reported for “Total: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
2,994 pathways was reported for “Total: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Total: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways
30 pathways
Other - Other Services
30 pathways was reported for “Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways
536 pathways
Other - Other Services
536 pathways was reported for “Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.
Definition and source
Published measure: Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways
Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.
For your decision Ask which specialty and hospital site will handle your referral, and about your own expected wait.
Diagnostic tests and waiting lists
Historical diagnostic waiting lists and completed test activity describe different groups.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
On the test waiting list
0 waiting-list entries
0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
29 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
80 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
564 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
710 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
37 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.
Definition and source
Published measure: URODYNAMICS: patients on the reported waiting list
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
20.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 29 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 29; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
2.5% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 80 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 80; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
6% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 564 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 564; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
6.3% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 710 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 710; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
8.1% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.
Based on 37 eligible waiting-list entries.
Definition and source
Published measure: URODYNAMICS: waiting six weeks or longer
The calculation uses a denominator of 37; see the source for the eligible group.
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
1,122 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CT: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
23 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
356 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
607 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRI: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
2,906 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
5,059 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: TOTAL: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
45 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.
Definition and source
Published measure: URODYNAMICS: reported diagnostic activity
Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.
For your decision Confirm the test, referral route and site before comparing providers.
Cancer waiting-time standards
Published performance against specific cancer pathway standards, with separate patient groups.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days
75.7%
75.7% was reported for “Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days
The calculation uses a denominator of 445; see the source for the eligible group.
July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.
Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat
85.4%
85.4% was reported for “Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat
The calculation uses a denominator of 48; see the source for the eligible group.
July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.
Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard
69.1%
69.1% was reported for “Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard
The calculation uses a denominator of 27.5; see the source for the eligible group.
July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.
For your decision Your clinical team can explain the next step and timescale for your own referral.
Hospital trends
Each measure retains its own reporting period. A&E reporting uses a changed footprint from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from our A&E trends.
July 2026 NHS reporting provider
A&E 12 hour performance
0%
0% was reported for “A&E 12 hour performance”. NHS England acute-provider table.
Definition and source
Published measure: A&E 12 hour performance
NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported. A&E footprint methodology changed from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from this comparison.
91.7% was reported for “A&E 4 hour performance”. NHS England acute-provider table.
Definition and source
Published measure: A&E 4 hour performance
NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported. A&E footprint methodology changed from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from this comparison.
Reported staff capacity across the organisation and its services.
June 2026 reporting organisation
All staff groups: Full-time equivalent
1,577.5 FTE
1,577.5 FTE was reported for “All staff groups: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: All staff groups: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
1,796 staff was reported for “All staff groups: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: All staff groups: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
144.6 FTE was reported for “NHS infrastructure support: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: NHS infrastructure support: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
156 staff was reported for “NHS infrastructure support: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: NHS infrastructure support: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
94.4 FTE was reported for “Central functions: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Central functions: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
100 staff was reported for “Central functions: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Central functions: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
15.4 FTE was reported for “Hotel, property & estates: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hotel, property & estates: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
20 staff was reported for “Hotel, property & estates: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Hotel, property & estates: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
20.8 FTE was reported for “Managers: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Managers: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
21 staff was reported for “Managers: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Managers: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
14 FTE was reported for “Senior managers: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Senior managers: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
15 staff was reported for “Senior managers: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Senior managers: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
1,063 FTE was reported for “Professionally qualified clinical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Professionally qualified clinical staff: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
1,206 staff was reported for “Professionally qualified clinical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Professionally qualified clinical staff: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
199.5 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - All grades: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - All grades: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
214 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - All grades: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - All grades: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
1 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
1 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
95.4 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Consultant: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Consultant: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
102 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Consultant: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Consultant: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
21.8 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Core Training: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Core Training: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
22 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Core Training: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Core Training: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
6.8 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
7 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
74.5 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
82 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
315.3 FTE was reported for “Midwives: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Midwives: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
376 staff was reported for “Midwives: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Midwives: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
404.2 FTE was reported for “Nurses & health visitors: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Nurses & health visitors: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
457 staff was reported for “Nurses & health visitors: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Nurses & health visitors: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
143.9 FTE was reported for “Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
160 staff was reported for “Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
370 FTE was reported for “Support to clinical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Support to clinical staff: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
435 staff was reported for “Support to clinical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Support to clinical staff: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent
336.7 FTE
336.7 FTE was reported for “Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
397 staff was reported for “Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
33.3 FTE was reported for “Support to ST&T staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Support to ST&T staff: Full-time equivalent
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
38 staff was reported for “Support to ST&T staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.
Definition and source
Published measure: Support to ST&T staff: Headcount
NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ537 (2026-04-01 00:00:00): Increase of 400 corporate and facilities staff at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (REM) following the transfer of these staff to the trust from Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RBQ) (330 staff) and Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust (REP) (70 staff).
For your decision These numbers do not show the staffing of a particular ward or appointment.
Infection surveillance: historical context
Historical reported infections, with surveillance definitions and reporting coverage.
July 2026 NHS acute trust
C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated
0 reported cases
0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 84 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated
1 reported cases
1 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association
0 reported cases
0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset indeterminate association (COIA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust between 29 and 84 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated
0 reported cases
0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is 3 days or more after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: C. difficile: No information
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
1 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: C. difficile: Total cases
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: C. difficile: Unknown
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: The reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the 3 months prior to CDI case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: E. coli: Community-onset, community-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: E. coli: Community-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: E. coli: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: E. coli: No information
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: E. coli: Total cases
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: E. coli: Unknown
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the E. coli case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, community-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
1 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Klebsiella spp: No information
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
1 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Total cases
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Unknown
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the Klebsiella spp. case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRSA: Community-onset, community-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRSA: No information
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRSA: Total cases
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MRSA: Unknown
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'Don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the MRSA case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MSSA: Community-onset, community-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MSSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
2 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MSSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MSSA: No information
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
2 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MSSA: Total cases
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: MSSA: Unknown
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the MSSA case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, community-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: No information
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Total cases
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.
Definition and source
Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Unknown
Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: LIVERPOOL WOMEN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the P. aeruginosa case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.
Environment assessments reported across an organisation, potentially covering several sites.
2025 reporting organisation
Cleanliness assessment
99.9%
99.9% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cleanliness assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.
99.9% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.
86.7% was reported for “Dementia assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Dementia assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.
89% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Disability assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.
96.2% was reported for “Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.
93.6% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Organisation Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.
87.2% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.
97.3% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ward Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores.