Independent information. England-wide.Public data. Clear sources.

NHS trusts · Birmingham

Birmingham Women'S And Children'S NHS Foundation Trust

Steelhouse Lane, Birmingham, B4 6NH

CQC: no overall rating shownActive source recordOrganisation information

What can I learn about Birmingham Women'S And Children'S NHS Foundation Trust?

No overall CQC rating is available on this profile. These figures describe an organisation or network; check which service and location would handle your care.

UNDERSTAND YOUR OPTIONS

Care and access: the published picture

Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.

Inpatient experience across this trust

Patients’ survey responses across the trust. These can include several hospital sites.

2025 survey NHS trust

Patients’ overall hospital experience

8 out of 10

8 out of 10 was reported for “Patients’ overall hospital experience”. Adult inpatients’ reported experience, scored out of 10 and adjusted by the publisher for age, sex and admission route. Higher scores mean more positive experiences; small differences do not establish a better hospital.

Definition and source

Published measure: Overall experience

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.59 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Being treated with respect and dignity

8.6 out of 10

8.6 out of 10 was reported for “Being treated with respect and dignity”. Adult inpatients’ reported experience of respect and dignity, scored out of 10. This describes the survey group and reporting unit shown, rather than every patient’s care.

Definition and source

Published measure: Respect and dignity

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.49.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?

8.5 out of 10

8.5 out of 10 was reported for “If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?

Reported sample: 128.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.39.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.6 out of 10
20249.1 out of 10
20258.5 out of 10
Explore 60 additional measures

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?

7.6 out of 10

7.6 out of 10 was reported for “Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?

Reported sample: 93.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.210 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 08.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20248.9 out of 10
20257.6 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.

5 out of 10

5 out of 10 was reported for “Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.

Reported sample: 123.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.48.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 05. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20245 out of 10
20255 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?

9.3 out of 10

9.3 out of 10 was reported for “During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?

Reported sample: 233.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.810 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.6 out of 10
20249.6 out of 10
20259.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?

8.9 out of 10

8.9 out of 10 was reported for “When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?

Reported sample: 239.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.19.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.7 out of 10
20248.6 out of 10
20258.9 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?

9.4 out of 10

9.4 out of 10 was reported for “Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?

Reported sample: 246.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.59.6 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.4. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.6 out of 10
20248.8 out of 10
20259.4 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?

8.8 out of 10

8.8 out of 10 was reported for “When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?

Reported sample: 245.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.19.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.5 out of 10
20249.2 out of 10
20258.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?

8.6 out of 10

8.6 out of 10 was reported for “When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?

Reported sample: 240.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.99.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.6 out of 10
20248.5 out of 10
20258.6 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?

8.4 out of 10

8.4 out of 10 was reported for “Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?

Reported sample: 246.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.29.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.5 out of 10
20249.2 out of 10
20258.4 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?

8.3 out of 10

8.3 out of 10 was reported for “When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?

Reported sample: 245.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 89.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.8 out of 10
20248.9 out of 10
20258.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?

5.5 out of 10

5.5 out of 10 was reported for “How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?

Reported sample: 183.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.98 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 05.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20245.6 out of 10
20255.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?

7.1 out of 10

7.1 out of 10 was reported for “In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?

Reported sample: 246.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.48.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.2 out of 10
20247.8 out of 10
20257.1 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?

7 out of 10

7 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?

Reported sample: 215.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.78.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 07.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.5 out of 10
20247.8 out of 10
20257 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?

7.3 out of 10

7.3 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?

Reported sample: 240.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.38.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 07.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.6 out of 10
20247.6 out of 10
20257.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?

8.9 out of 10

8.9 out of 10 was reported for “How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?

Reported sample: 241.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.39.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.5 out of 10
20248.8 out of 10
20258.9 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?

6.8 out of 10

6.8 out of 10 was reported for “Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?

Reported sample: 225.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.78.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.1 out of 10
20248 out of 10
20256.8 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?

9.3 out of 10

9.3 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?

Reported sample: 241.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.910 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.1 out of 10
20249.7 out of 10
20259.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?

8.3 out of 10

8.3 out of 10 was reported for “Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?

Reported sample: 237.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.19.6 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238 out of 10
20248.9 out of 10
20258.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?

7.7 out of 10

7.7 out of 10 was reported for “Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?

Reported sample: 230.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.59.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.9 out of 10
20248.7 out of 10
20257.7 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)

8.3 out of 10

8.3 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)

Reported sample: 54.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.89.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)

6.8 out of 10

6.8 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)

Reported sample: 62.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.110 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)

8.9 out of 10

8.9 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)

Reported sample: 46.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.49.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)

9.2 out of 10

9.2 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)

Reported sample: 63.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.79.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)

5.3 out of 10

5.3 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)

Reported sample: 88.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.410 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)

4.5 out of 10

4.5 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)

Reported sample: 70.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 3.88.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?

Not reported

There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.

Definition and source

Published measure: Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3).

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?

Not reported

There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3).

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?

6.3 out of 10

6.3 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?

Reported sample: 242.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.77.7 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 07.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20236.8 out of 10
20247.6 out of 10
20256.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?

4.6 out of 10

4.6 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?

Reported sample: 163.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.37.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?

6.1 out of 10

6.1 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?

Reported sample: 60.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.310 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.2 out of 10
20245.8 out of 10
20256.1 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?

6.2 out of 10

6.2 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?

Reported sample: 246.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.98 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 07.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.3 out of 10
20247.6 out of 10
20256.2 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.

8.4 out of 10

8.4 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.

Reported sample: 236.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.69.2 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.1 out of 10
20248.7 out of 10
20258.4 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?

8.3 out of 10

8.3 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?

Reported sample: 208.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 810 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.3. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20239.3 out of 10
20248.5 out of 10
20258.3 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?

5.6 out of 10

5.6 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?

Reported sample: 152.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.77.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?

3.9 out of 10

3.9 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?

Reported sample: 195.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 3.55.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 04.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20234.2 out of 10
20244.2 out of 10
20253.9 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.

7 out of 10

7 out of 10 was reported for “How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.

Reported sample: 183.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.98.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 07. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20247 out of 10
20257 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?

5.5 out of 10

5.5 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?

Reported sample: 223.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.48 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 06.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20235.6 out of 10
20246.2 out of 10
20255.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?

8.2 out of 10

8.2 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?

Reported sample: 235.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.39.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.4. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.2 out of 10
20249.4 out of 10
20258.2 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.

6 out of 10

6 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.

Reported sample: 93.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.510 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20234.7 out of 10
20248.1 out of 10
20256 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.

3.5 out of 10

3.5 out of 10 was reported for “After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.

Reported sample: 141.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Much worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.78 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20242025 · vertical scale 05. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20245 out of 10
20253.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?

8.5 out of 10

8.5 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?

Reported sample: 245.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.39.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.6 out of 10
20248.8 out of 10
20258.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?

8.6 out of 10

8.6 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?

Reported sample: 244.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.49.9 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.3. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.7 out of 10
20249.3 out of 10
20258.6 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.

8 out of 10

8 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.

Reported sample: 245.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.59 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.8 out of 10
20248.6 out of 10
20258 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?

8.5 out of 10

8.5 out of 10 was reported for “How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?

Reported sample: 243.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.78 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.5 out of 10
20247.4 out of 10
20258.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients

7.6 out of 10

7.6 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients

Reported sample: 244.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.47.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 07.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.2 out of 10
20247.6 out of 10
20257.6 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff

9.5 out of 10

9.5 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff

Reported sample: 244.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Much better.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.99 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 09.5. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.3 out of 10
20249.2 out of 10
20259.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting

8.2 out of 10

8.2 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting

Reported sample: 244.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.29.6 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.5 out of 10
20248.8 out of 10
20258.2 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature

8.4 out of 10

8.4 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature

Reported sample: 244.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.210 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.9 out of 10
20248.6 out of 10
20258.4 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping

3.7 out of 10

3.7 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping

Reported sample: 244.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 2.45.4 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 04.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20234.1 out of 10
20243.7 out of 10
20253.7 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?

8.5 out of 10

8.5 out of 10 was reported for “How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?

Reported sample: 244.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.39.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20238.9 out of 10
20248.7 out of 10
20258.5 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?

7 out of 10

7 out of 10 was reported for “Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?

Reported sample: 187.

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.99.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

20232025 · vertical scale 08. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
20237.2 out of 10
20248 out of 10
20257 out of 10

2025 survey NHS trust

Admission to hospital

7 out of 10

7 out of 10 was reported for “Admission to hospital”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Admission to hospital

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.38 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Kindness and compassion

8.5 out of 10

8.5 out of 10 was reported for “Kindness and compassion”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Kindness and compassion

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.39.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

The hospital and ward

7.7 out of 10

7.7 out of 10 was reported for “The hospital and ward”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: The hospital and ward

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 78.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Basic needs

7.5 out of 10

7.5 out of 10 was reported for “Basic needs”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Basic needs

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.29 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Doctors

9 out of 10

9 out of 10 was reported for “Doctors”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Doctors

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.49.3 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Nurses

8.1 out of 10

8.1 out of 10 was reported for “Nurses”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Nurses

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 89.1 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Your care and treatment

7.9 out of 10

7.9 out of 10 was reported for “Your care and treatment”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Your care and treatment

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.88.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Individual needs

7.2 out of 10

7.2 out of 10 was reported for “Individual needs”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Individual needs

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: About the same.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.19.5 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Virtual wards

Not reported

There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.

Definition and source

Published measure: Virtual wards

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3).

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

2025 survey NHS trust

Leaving hospital

6.1 out of 10

6.1 out of 10 was reported for “Leaving hospital”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.

Definition and source

Published measure: Leaving hospital

Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher comparison band: Worse.

Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.27.8 out of 10.

Adult inpatient survey: trust results · Coverage and method

For your decision Check whether a site-level survey is also available for the hospital you would attend.

Referral-to-treatment pathways

How long treatment pathways had already been waiting at the reporting date. One person can have more than one pathway.

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

65.7%

Total

65.7% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 22,274 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 22,274; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

22,274 waiting-list entries

Total

22,274 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

2 waiting-list entries

Urology Service

2 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

Explore 44 additional measures

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

1 waiting-list entries

Trauma and Orthopaedic Service

1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

1 waiting-list entries

Ear Nose and Throat Service

1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

1 waiting-list entries

Ophthalmology Service

1 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

6,185 waiting-list entries

Gynaecology Service

6,185 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

6,282 waiting-list entries

Other - Medical Services

6,282 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

8 waiting-list entries

Other - Mental Health Services

8 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Mental Health Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

9,396 waiting-list entries

Other - Paediatric Services

9,396 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

103 waiting-list entries

Other - Surgical Services

103 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Still on the waiting list

295 waiting-list entries

Other - Other Services

295 referral-to-treatment records were still open at the end of July 2026. One person may have more than one record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

50%

Urology Service

50% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 2 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 2; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

0%

Trauma and Orthopaedic Service

0% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

0%

Ear Nose and Throat Service

0% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

100%

Ophthalmology Service

100% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

56.8%

Gynaecology Service

56.8% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 6,185 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 6,185; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

67.6%

Other - Medical Services

67.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 6,282 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 6,282; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

87.5%

Other - Mental Health Services

87.5% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 8 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Mental Health Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 8; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

69.9%

Other - Paediatric Services

69.9% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 9,396 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 9,396; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

57.3%

Other - Surgical Services

57.3% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 103 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 103; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 18 weeks or less

77.6%

Other - Other Services

77.6% of eligible open waiting-list records had already waited 18 weeks or less. This is time elapsed, not time left before treatment.

Based on 295 eligible waiting-list entries with a known start date.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways within 18 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 295; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Uses pathways with a known clock start date. This is elapsed waiting time, not a prediction of the remaining wait.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Urology Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 2 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Urology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 2; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Trauma and Orthopaedic Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Trauma and Orthopaedic Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Ear Nose and Throat Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Ophthalmology Service

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 1 eligible waiting-list entry. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ophthalmology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 1; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0.3%

Gynaecology Service

0.3% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 6,185 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gynaecology Service: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 6,185; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0.5%

Total

0.5% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 22,274 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 22,274; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

1%

Other - Medical Services

1% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 6,282 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 6,282; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0%

Other - Mental Health Services

0% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 8 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Mental Health Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 8; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0.3%

Other - Paediatric Services

0.3% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 9,396 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 9,396; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

1.9%

Other - Surgical Services

1.9% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 103 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 103; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting over a year

0.3%

Other - Other Services

0.3% of open waiting-list records had already waited more than a year. Your referral team can explain your own next step.

Based on 295 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: ongoing pathways over 52 weeks

The calculation uses a denominator of 295; see the source for the eligible group.

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways

2 pathways

Ear Nose and Throat Service

2 pathways was reported for “Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ear Nose and Throat Service: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways

43 pathways

Gynaecology Service

43 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways

891 pathways

Gynaecology Service

891 pathways was reported for “Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Gynaecology Service: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Total: completed admitted pathways

520 pathways

Total

520 pathways was reported for “Total: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Total: completed non-admitted pathways

3,958 pathways

Total

3,958 pathways was reported for “Total: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Total: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Medical Services: completed admitted pathways

7 pathways

Other - Medical Services

7 pathways was reported for “Other - Medical Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Medical Services: completed non-admitted pathways

1,111 pathways

Other - Medical Services

1,111 pathways was reported for “Other - Medical Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Medical Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Mental Health Services: completed non-admitted pathways

2 pathways

Other - Mental Health Services

2 pathways was reported for “Other - Mental Health Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Mental Health Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Paediatric Services: completed admitted pathways

464 pathways

Other - Paediatric Services

464 pathways was reported for “Other - Paediatric Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Paediatric Services: completed non-admitted pathways

1,813 pathways

Other - Paediatric Services

1,813 pathways was reported for “Other - Paediatric Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Paediatric Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Surgical Services: completed admitted pathways

2 pathways

Other - Surgical Services

2 pathways was reported for “Other - Surgical Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways

7 pathways

Other - Surgical Services

7 pathways was reported for “Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Surgical Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways

2 pathways

Other - Other Services

2 pathways was reported for “Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: completed admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways

134 pathways

Other - Other Services

134 pathways was reported for “Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways”. Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners.

Definition and source

Published measure: Other - Other Services: completed non-admitted pathways

Provider-level NHS RTT pathways aggregated across commissioners. A person can have multiple pathways. Specialty figures do not identify the wait for a particular procedure or hospital site. Completed admitted and non-admitted pathways describe different cohorts.

Referral-to-treatment waiting times · Coverage and method

For your decision Ask which specialty and hospital site will handle your referral, and about your own expected wait.

Diagnostic tests and waiting lists

Historical diagnostic waiting lists and completed test activity describe different groups.

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

385 waiting-list entries

385 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: AUDIOLOGY_ASSESSMENTS: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

27 waiting-list entries

27 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: BARIUM_ENEMA: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

275 waiting-list entries

275 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

Explore 42 additional measures

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

133 waiting-list entries

133 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: CT: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

15 waiting-list entries

15 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

44 waiting-list entries

44 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

95 waiting-list entries

95 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

0 waiting-list entries

0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

0 waiting-list entries

0 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

561 waiting-list entries

561 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRI: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

1,473 waiting-list entries

1,473 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

35 waiting-list entries

35 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

150 waiting-list entries

150 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: SLEEP_STUDIES: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

3,388 waiting-list entries

3,388 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: TOTAL: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

On the test waiting list

195 waiting-list entries

195 test waiting-list records were reported at the end of July 2026. A person can be waiting for more than one test.

Definition and source

Published measure: URODYNAMICS: patients on the reported waiting list

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

25.5%

25.5% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 385 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: AUDIOLOGY_ASSESSMENTS: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 385; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

0%

0% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 27 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: BARIUM_ENEMA: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 27; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

53.8%

53.8% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 275 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 275; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

30.8%

30.8% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 133 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: CT: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 133; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

26.7%

26.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 15 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 15; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

34.1%

34.1% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 44 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 44; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

5.3%

5.3% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 95 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 95; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

Not reported

There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.

Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

Not reported

There is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.

Based on 0 eligible waiting-list entries. A small number of records can make this percentage change sharply; avoid drawing strong comparisons.

Definition and source

Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 0; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

17.7%

17.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 561 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRI: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 561; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

22.2%

22.2% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 1,473 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 1,473; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

5.7%

5.7% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 35 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 35; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

36%

36% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 150 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: SLEEP_STUDIES: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 150; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

26.4%

26.4% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 3,388 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: TOTAL: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 3,388; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Already waiting 6 weeks or longer

51.3%

51.3% of eligible test waiting-list records had already waited six weeks or longer. It does not predict the remaining wait for your test.

Based on 195 eligible waiting-list entries.

Definition and source

Published measure: URODYNAMICS: waiting six weeks or longer

The calculation uses a denominator of 195; see the source for the eligible group.

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

344 tests

344 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: AUDIOLOGY_ASSESSMENTS: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

39 tests

39 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: BARIUM_ENEMA: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

120 tests

120 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: COLONOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

350 tests

350 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: CT: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

20 tests

20 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: CYSTOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

46 tests

46 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: DEXA_SCAN: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

1,161 tests

1,161 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

3 tests

3 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: FLEXI_SIGMOIDOSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

1 tests

1 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: GASTROSCOPY: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

673 tests

673 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRI: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

2,250 tests

2,250 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: NON_OBSTETRIC_ULTRASOUND: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

26 tests

26 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: PERIPHERAL_NEUROPHYS: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

42 tests

42 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: SLEEP_STUDIES: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

5,154 tests

5,154 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: TOTAL: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Tests recorded during the month

79 tests

79 tests was reported for “Tests recorded during the month”. Reported tests carried out during the month, including planned and unscheduled work. This is different from the number still waiting.

Definition and source

Published measure: URODYNAMICS: reported diagnostic activity

Diagnostic waiting list and activity at reporting-provider level. Planned and unscheduled activity are separate from the waiting-list cohort. Not a live booking estimate.

Diagnostic waiting times and activity · Coverage and method

For your decision Confirm the test, referral route and site before comparing providers.

Cancer waiting-time standards

Published performance against specific cancer pathway standards, with separate patient groups.

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days

83.3%

83.3% was reported for “Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer faster diagnosis within 28 days

The calculation uses a denominator of 186; see the source for the eligible group.

July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.

Cancer waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat

100%

100% was reported for “Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer treatment within 31 days of a decision to treat

The calculation uses a denominator of 66; see the source for the eligible group.

July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.

Cancer waiting times · Coverage and method

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard

100%

100% was reported for “Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard”. July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer treatment within the combined 62-day standard

The calculation uses a denominator of 11; see the source for the eligible group.

July 2026 provisional provider-based statistics. The cancer standards have distinct eligibility, start points and cohorts; they cannot be combined into an overall score.

Cancer waiting times · Coverage and method

For your decision Your clinical team can explain the next step and timescale for your own referral.

Hospital trends

Each measure retains its own reporting period. A&E reporting uses a changed footprint from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from our A&E trends.

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

A&E 12 hour performance

0.4%

0.4% was reported for “A&E 12 hour performance”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: A&E 12 hour performance

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported. A&E footprint methodology changed from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from this comparison.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2026-042026-07 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2026-04Not reported
2026-05Not reported
2026-060.2%
2026-070.4%

July 2026 NHS reporting provider

A&E 4 hour performance

86.6%

86.6% was reported for “A&E 4 hour performance”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: A&E 4 hour performance

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported. A&E footprint methodology changed from April 2026; earlier points are excluded from this comparison.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2026-042026-07 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2026-0484.2%
2026-0588.4%
2026-0683.7%
2026-0786.6%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer 31 Day Treatment Standard

100%

100% was reported for “Cancer 31 Day Treatment Standard”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer 31 Day Treatment Standard

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06100%
2025-0798.4%
2025-08100%
2025-09100%
2025-10100%
2025-11100%
2025-12100%
2026-01100%
2026-02100%
2026-03100%
2026-04100%
2026-05100%
2026-06100%
Explore 5 additional measures

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer 62 Day Combined Performance

78.6%

78.6% was reported for “Cancer 62 Day Combined Performance”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer 62 Day Combined Performance

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0685.7%
2025-0761.5%
2025-0875%
2025-0992.3%
2025-1050%
2025-1174.1%
2025-1261.1%
2026-0170.6%
2026-0260%
2026-0390%
2026-0478.6%
2026-0571.4%
2026-0678.6%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Cancer Faster Diagnostic Standard

88%

88% was reported for “Cancer Faster Diagnostic Standard”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cancer Faster Diagnostic Standard

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0686.3%
2025-0781.4%
2025-0874%
2025-0979.9%
2025-1078.6%
2025-1185%
2025-1283.5%
2026-0165.5%
2026-0281.8%
2026-0383.3%
2026-0481.1%
2026-0582.5%
2026-0688%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Diagnostics proportion waiting over 6 weeks

26.8%

26.8% was reported for “Diagnostics proportion waiting over 6 weeks”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Diagnostics proportion waiting over 6 weeks

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0631.8%
2025-0724.3%
2025-0827.3%
2025-0935.6%
2025-1026.7%
2025-1121.5%
2025-1229.3%
2026-0131.9%
2026-0222.9%
2026-0323.4%
2026-0435.6%
2026-0530.3%
2026-0626.8%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Percentage waiting more than 52 weeks for elective treatment

0.5%

0.5% was reported for “Percentage waiting more than 52 weeks for elective treatment”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Percentage waiting more than 52 weeks for elective treatment

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-060.8%
2025-071%
2025-081.1%
2025-090.9%
2025-100.6%
2025-110.5%
2025-120.6%
2026-010.8%
2026-020.8%
2026-030.6%
2026-040.6%
2026-050.5%
2026-060.5%

June 2026 NHS reporting provider

Percentage waiting within 18 weeks for elective treatment

66%

66% was reported for “Percentage waiting within 18 weeks for elective treatment”. NHS England acute-provider table.

Definition and source

Published measure: Percentage waiting within 18 weeks for elective treatment

NHS England acute-provider table. Each measure retains its own reporting month. Site attribution is not supported.

Acute provider table and time series · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0100%. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0657.2%
2025-0757.1%
2025-0856.5%
2025-0957.4%
2025-1058.8%
2025-1158.7%
2025-1259%
2026-0158.6%
2026-0258.8%
2026-0362.1%
2026-0462.1%
2026-0564.8%
2026-0666%

Autism referral pathways and coverage

First care contact is not diagnosis. MHSDS coverage excludes community paediatric autism assessments recorded through CSDS. Missing and suppressed values are retained; reporting-provider results are not site forecasts.

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of new suspected autism referrals in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of new suspected autism referrals in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of new suspected autism referrals for those aged 0 to 17 in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of new suspected autism referrals for those aged 0 to 17 in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of new suspected autism referrals for those aged 18 and over in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of new suspected autism referrals for those aged 18 and over in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

Explore 42 additional measures

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of closed suspected autism referrals in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of closed suspected autism referrals in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of closed suspected autism referrals for those aged 0 to 17 in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of closed suspected autism referrals for those aged 0 to 17 in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of closed suspected autism referrals for those aged 18 and over in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of closed suspected autism referrals for those aged 18 and over in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month per 100,000 of the population

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month per 100,000 of the population

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks per 100,000 of the population

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks per 100,000 of the population

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month per 100,000 of the population

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month per 100,000 of the population

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks per 100,000 of the population

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks per 100,000 of the population

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month per 100,000 of the population

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month per 100,000 of the population

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks per 100,000 of the population

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks per 100,000 of the population

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment in 13 weeks or less

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment in 13 weeks or less

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment after more than 13 weeks

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment after more than 13 weeks

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks that have not had a care contact appointment recorded

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks that have not had a care contact appointment recorded

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment in 13 weeks or less

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment in 13 weeks or less

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment in 13 weeks or less

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment in 13 weeks or less

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment after more than 13 weeks

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment after more than 13 weeks

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks that have not had a care contact appointment recorded

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks that have not had a care contact appointment recorded

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment after more than 13 weeks

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks receiving a first appointment after more than 13 weeks

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks that have not had a care contact appointment recorded

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral in the month that has been open for at least 13 weeks that have not had a care contact appointment recorded

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients which have an open suspected autism referral in the month receiving at least one care contact in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients which have an open suspected autism referral in the month receiving at least one care contact in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 which have an open suspected autism referral in the month receiving at least one care contact in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 which have an open suspected autism referral in the month receiving at least one care contact in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over which have an open suspected autism referral in the month receiving at least one care contact in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over which have an open suspected autism referral in the month receiving at least one care contact in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral receiving an autism diagnosis in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral receiving an autism diagnosis in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral receiving an autism diagnosis in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral receiving an autism diagnosis in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral receiving an autism diagnosis in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral receiving an autism diagnosis in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral receiving a Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis in the month that is not an autism diagnosis

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral receiving a Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis in the month that is not an autism diagnosis

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral receiving a Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis in the month that is not an autism diagnosis

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral receiving a Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis in the month that is not an autism diagnosis

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral receiving a Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis in the month that is not an autism diagnosis

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral receiving a Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis in the month that is not an autism diagnosis

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral receiving a non-Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis recorded in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients with an open suspected autism referral receiving a non-Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis recorded in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral receiving a non-Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis recorded in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral receiving a non-Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis recorded in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

June 2026 reporting provider

Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral receiving a non-Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis recorded in the month

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral receiving a non-Mental and Behavioural disorder diagnosis recorded in the month

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

April–June 2026 reporting provider

Median waiting time in days of patients with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Median waiting time in days of patients with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

April–June 2026 reporting provider

Median waiting time in days of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Median waiting time in days of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

April–June 2026 reporting provider

Median waiting time in days of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Median waiting time in days of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

April–June 2026 reporting provider

Number of open referrals of patients with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of open referrals of patients with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

April–June 2026 reporting provider

Number of open referrals of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of open referrals of patients aged 0 to 17 with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

April–June 2026 reporting provider

Number of open referrals of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

Exact value withheld

The publisher has withheld this value. It must not be treated as zero.

Definition and source

Published measure: Number of open referrals of patients aged 18 and over with an open suspected autism referral where their first care contact was in the quarter

MHSDS suspected-autism referral measures. Community paediatric assessments reported through CSDS are not included; this is incomplete pathway coverage. First care contact does not mean assessment completion or diagnosis. Referrals and patients are different counts. Small counts are suppressed/rounded; no subtraction or sum is used to reconstruct them. Source reporting status: Latest Available Data. Check source data-quality comments before comparing providers.

Autism statistics · Coverage and method

National figures and other reporting organisations

Hospital and community workforce

Reported staff capacity across the organisation and its services.

June 2026 reporting organisation

All staff groups: Full-time equivalent

5,532.5 FTE

5,532.5 FTE was reported for “All staff groups: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: All staff groups: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 06,198.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-066,198.8 FTE
2025-075,706.6 FTE
2025-085,697.4 FTE
2025-095,683.5 FTE
2025-105,655.8 FTE
2025-115,627.3 FTE
2025-125,597.7 FTE
2026-015,596 FTE
2026-025,582.5 FTE
2026-035,568.7 FTE
2026-045,561.4 FTE
2026-055,555.2 FTE
2026-065,532.5 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

All staff groups: Headcount

6,273 staff

6,273 staff was reported for “All staff groups: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: All staff groups: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 06,986. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-066,986 staff
2025-076,455 staff
2025-086,451 staff
2025-096,430 staff
2025-106,400 staff
2025-116,372 staff
2025-126,338 staff
2026-016,335 staff
2026-026,321 staff
2026-036,304 staff
2026-046,295 staff
2026-056,291 staff
2026-066,273 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

NHS infrastructure support: Full-time equivalent

755.1 FTE

755.1 FTE was reported for “NHS infrastructure support: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: NHS infrastructure support: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0798.1. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06798.1 FTE
2025-07775 FTE
2025-08779.1 FTE
2025-09788.5 FTE
2025-10788.4 FTE
2025-11778.2 FTE
2025-12770.2 FTE
2026-01765 FTE
2026-02762.2 FTE
2026-03750.6 FTE
2026-04760.6 FTE
2026-05756.3 FTE
2026-06755.1 FTE
Explore 37 additional measures

June 2026 reporting organisation

NHS infrastructure support: Headcount

839 staff

839 staff was reported for “NHS infrastructure support: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: NHS infrastructure support: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0885. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06885 staff
2025-07861 staff
2025-08867 staff
2025-09877 staff
2025-10876 staff
2025-11866 staff
2025-12856 staff
2026-01851 staff
2026-02849 staff
2026-03835 staff
2026-04845 staff
2026-05840 staff
2026-06839 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Central functions: Full-time equivalent

422 FTE

422 FTE was reported for “Central functions: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Central functions: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0441.3. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06436.7 FTE
2025-07423.4 FTE
2025-08426.2 FTE
2025-09437.6 FTE
2025-10441.3 FTE
2025-11435.3 FTE
2025-12426.6 FTE
2026-01425.6 FTE
2026-02422.4 FTE
2026-03417 FTE
2026-04426.2 FTE
2026-05423.7 FTE
2026-06422 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Central functions: Headcount

453 staff

453 staff was reported for “Central functions: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Central functions: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0473. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06468 staff
2025-07454 staff
2025-08458 staff
2025-09470 staff
2025-10473 staff
2025-11468 staff
2025-12457 staff
2026-01456 staff
2026-02454 staff
2026-03447 staff
2026-04458 staff
2026-05455 staff
2026-06453 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Hotel, property & estates: Full-time equivalent

187.8 FTE

187.8 FTE was reported for “Hotel, property & estates: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Hotel, property & estates: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0201.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06200.5 FTE
2025-07199.7 FTE
2025-08200.7 FTE
2025-09201.2 FTE
2025-10200.3 FTE
2025-11199.1 FTE
2025-12198.1 FTE
2026-01196 FTE
2026-02195.3 FTE
2026-03191.1 FTE
2026-04189.9 FTE
2026-05188.2 FTE
2026-06187.8 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Hotel, property & estates: Headcount

235 staff

235 staff was reported for “Hotel, property & estates: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Hotel, property & estates: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0252. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06250 staff
2025-07250 staff
2025-08252 staff
2025-09252 staff
2025-10251 staff
2025-11249 staff
2025-12249 staff
2026-01246 staff
2026-02245 staff
2026-03240 staff
2026-04237 staff
2026-05235 staff
2026-06235 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Managers: Full-time equivalent

98.2 FTE

98.2 FTE was reported for “Managers: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Managers: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0111. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06111 FTE
2025-07103 FTE
2025-08103.3 FTE
2025-09100.9 FTE
2025-1099.9 FTE
2025-1197.9 FTE
2025-1299.7 FTE
2026-0198.1 FTE
2026-0298.1 FTE
2026-0396.1 FTE
2026-0496.2 FTE
2026-0597.1 FTE
2026-0698.2 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Managers: Headcount

102 staff

102 staff was reported for “Managers: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Managers: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0116. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06116 staff
2025-07107 staff
2025-08107 staff
2025-09105 staff
2025-10104 staff
2025-11102 staff
2025-12103 staff
2026-01102 staff
2026-02102 staff
2026-03100 staff
2026-04100 staff
2026-05101 staff
2026-06102 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Senior managers: Full-time equivalent

47.2 FTE

47.2 FTE was reported for “Senior managers: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Senior managers: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 049.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0649.9 FTE
2025-0748.9 FTE
2025-0848.9 FTE
2025-0948.9 FTE
2025-1046.9 FTE
2025-1145.9 FTE
2025-1245.8 FTE
2026-0145.4 FTE
2026-0246.4 FTE
2026-0346.4 FTE
2026-0448.3 FTE
2026-0547.3 FTE
2026-0647.2 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Senior managers: Headcount

49 staff

49 staff was reported for “Senior managers: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Senior managers: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 051. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0651 staff
2025-0750 staff
2025-0850 staff
2025-0950 staff
2025-1048 staff
2025-1147 staff
2025-1247 staff
2026-0147 staff
2026-0248 staff
2026-0348 staff
2026-0450 staff
2026-0549 staff
2026-0649 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Professionally qualified clinical staff: Full-time equivalent

3,464.1 FTE

3,464.1 FTE was reported for “Professionally qualified clinical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Professionally qualified clinical staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 03,777.6. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-063,777.6 FTE
2025-073,502 FTE
2025-083,506.1 FTE
2025-093,513.9 FTE
2025-103,509 FTE
2025-113,497.2 FTE
2025-123,490.9 FTE
2026-013,504.1 FTE
2026-023,482.3 FTE
2026-033,493 FTE
2026-043,483.5 FTE
2026-053,472.1 FTE
2026-063,464.1 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Professionally qualified clinical staff: Headcount

3,935 staff

3,935 staff was reported for “Professionally qualified clinical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Professionally qualified clinical staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 04,267. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-064,267 staff
2025-073,966 staff
2025-083,976 staff
2025-093,979 staff
2025-103,975 staff
2025-113,964 staff
2025-123,957 staff
2026-013,972 staff
2026-023,948 staff
2026-033,959 staff
2026-043,949 staff
2026-053,939 staff
2026-063,935 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - All grades: Full-time equivalent

655.6 FTE

655.6 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - All grades: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - All grades: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0699.4. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06699.4 FTE
2025-07648 FTE
2025-08651.3 FTE
2025-09672.9 FTE
2025-10669.1 FTE
2025-11663.1 FTE
2025-12661.6 FTE
2026-01665.7 FTE
2026-02654.5 FTE
2026-03660.1 FTE
2026-04669.3 FTE
2026-05663.2 FTE
2026-06655.6 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - All grades: Headcount

709 staff

709 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - All grades: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - All grades: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0748. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06748 staff
2025-07695 staff
2025-08703 staff
2025-09723 staff
2025-10721 staff
2025-11715 staff
2025-12712 staff
2026-01718 staff
2026-02707 staff
2026-03712 staff
2026-04723 staff
2026-05718 staff
2026-06709 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Full-time equivalent

2 FTE

2 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 04. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-064 FTE
2025-073 FTE
2025-082 FTE
2025-093 FTE
2025-103 FTE
2025-113 FTE
2025-122 FTE
2026-012 FTE
2026-022 FTE
2026-032 FTE
2026-042 FTE
2026-052 FTE
2026-062 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Headcount

2 staff

2 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Associate Specialist: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 04. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-064 staff
2025-073 staff
2025-082 staff
2025-093 staff
2025-103 staff
2025-113 staff
2025-122 staff
2026-012 staff
2026-022 staff
2026-032 staff
2026-042 staff
2026-052 staff
2026-062 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Consultant: Full-time equivalent

314.2 FTE

314.2 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Consultant: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Consultant: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0339. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06339 FTE
2025-07323.7 FTE
2025-08318.6 FTE
2025-09319.9 FTE
2025-10319.6 FTE
2025-11315.9 FTE
2025-12312.8 FTE
2026-01316.7 FTE
2026-02314.7 FTE
2026-03315.5 FTE
2026-04317.1 FTE
2026-05314.1 FTE
2026-06314.2 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Consultant: Headcount

346 staff

346 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Consultant: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Consultant: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0369. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06369 staff
2025-07353 staff
2025-08349 staff
2025-09349 staff
2025-10349 staff
2025-11346 staff
2025-12342 staff
2026-01348 staff
2026-02346 staff
2026-03347 staff
2026-04347 staff
2026-05347 staff
2026-06346 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Core Training: Full-time equivalent

6.7 FTE

6.7 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Core Training: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Core Training: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 015.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0615.2 FTE
2025-079.6 FTE
2025-088.6 FTE
2025-098.6 FTE
2025-108.6 FTE
2025-118.6 FTE
2025-128.6 FTE
2026-018.6 FTE
2026-027.6 FTE
2026-036.7 FTE
2026-046.7 FTE
2026-056.7 FTE
2026-066.7 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Core Training: Headcount

7 staff

7 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Core Training: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Core Training: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 016. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0616 staff
2025-0710 staff
2025-089 staff
2025-099 staff
2025-109 staff
2025-119 staff
2025-129 staff
2026-019 staff
2026-028 staff
2026-037 staff
2026-047 staff
2026-057 staff
2026-067 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Full-time equivalent

6 FTE

6 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 07. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-065 FTE
2025-075 FTE
2025-086 FTE
2025-096 FTE
2025-106 FTE
2025-116 FTE
2025-126 FTE
2026-016 FTE
2026-026 FTE
2026-036 FTE
2026-047 FTE
2026-056 FTE
2026-066 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Headcount

6 staff

6 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Foundation Doctor Year 2: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 07. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-065 staff
2025-075 staff
2025-086 staff
2025-096 staff
2025-106 staff
2025-116 staff
2025-126 staff
2026-016 staff
2026-026 staff
2026-036 staff
2026-047 staff
2026-056 staff
2026-066 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Full-time equivalent

11.4 FTE

11.4 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 024.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0624.8 FTE
2025-0710.9 FTE
2025-0811 FTE
2025-0911 FTE
2025-1011 FTE
2025-1110.9 FTE
2025-1210.9 FTE
2026-0110.9 FTE
2026-0210.9 FTE
2026-0310.7 FTE
2026-0411.7 FTE
2026-0511.4 FTE
2026-0611.4 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Headcount

13 staff

13 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Doctor: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 027. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-0627 staff
2025-0713 staff
2025-0813 staff
2025-0913 staff
2025-1013 staff
2025-1113 staff
2025-1213 staff
2026-0113 staff
2026-0213 staff
2026-0313 staff
2026-0414 staff
2026-0513 staff
2026-0613 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Full-time equivalent

315.3 FTE

315.3 FTE was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0324.8. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06311.5 FTE
2025-07295.8 FTE
2025-08305.1 FTE
2025-09324.5 FTE
2025-10321 FTE
2025-11318.7 FTE
2025-12321.3 FTE
2026-01321.6 FTE
2026-02313.2 FTE
2026-03319.3 FTE
2026-04324.8 FTE
2026-05323 FTE
2026-06315.3 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Headcount

335 staff

335 staff was reported for “HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: HCHS doctors - Specialty Registrar: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0346. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06327 staff
2025-07311 staff
2025-08324 staff
2025-09343 staff
2025-10341 staff
2025-11338 staff
2025-12340 staff
2026-01340 staff
2026-02332 staff
2026-03337 staff
2026-04346 staff
2026-05343 staff
2026-06335 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Midwives: Full-time equivalent

336.2 FTE

336.2 FTE was reported for “Midwives: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Midwives: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0336.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06330.5 FTE
2025-07327.9 FTE
2025-08324.6 FTE
2025-09321.9 FTE
2025-10326.1 FTE
2025-11324.9 FTE
2025-12327 FTE
2026-01326.2 FTE
2026-02328.2 FTE
2026-03334.3 FTE
2026-04336.7 FTE
2026-05334.3 FTE
2026-06336.2 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Midwives: Headcount

406 staff

406 staff was reported for “Midwives: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Midwives: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0406. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06396 staff
2025-07393 staff
2025-08390 staff
2025-09386 staff
2025-10389 staff
2025-11388 staff
2025-12391 staff
2026-01391 staff
2026-02393 staff
2026-03402 staff
2026-04404 staff
2026-05403 staff
2026-06406 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Nurses & health visitors: Full-time equivalent

1,606.1 FTE

1,606.1 FTE was reported for “Nurses & health visitors: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Nurses & health visitors: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,800.7. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,800.7 FTE
2025-071,668.5 FTE
2025-081,663.2 FTE
2025-091,644.8 FTE
2025-101,641.3 FTE
2025-111,638.5 FTE
2025-121,630.1 FTE
2026-011,639.6 FTE
2026-021,623.3 FTE
2026-031,614.6 FTE
2026-041,603.8 FTE
2026-051,605.8 FTE
2026-061,606.1 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Nurses & health visitors: Headcount

1,839 staff

1,839 staff was reported for “Nurses & health visitors: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Nurses & health visitors: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 02,048. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-062,048 staff
2025-071,905 staff
2025-081,901 staff
2025-091,882 staff
2025-101,879 staff
2025-111,875 staff
2025-121,866 staff
2026-011,877 staff
2026-021,857 staff
2026-031,848 staff
2026-041,834 staff
2026-051,836 staff
2026-061,839 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Full-time equivalent

866.3 FTE

866.3 FTE was reported for “Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0947. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06947 FTE
2025-07857.6 FTE
2025-08867 FTE
2025-09874.3 FTE
2025-10872.6 FTE
2025-11870.8 FTE
2025-12872.2 FTE
2026-01872.6 FTE
2026-02876.3 FTE
2026-03884.1 FTE
2026-04873.7 FTE
2026-05868.9 FTE
2026-06866.3 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Headcount

982 staff

982 staff was reported for “Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Scientific, therapeutic & technical staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,077. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,077 staff
2025-07974 staff
2025-08984 staff
2025-09990 staff
2025-10989 staff
2025-11988 staff
2025-12990 staff
2026-01988 staff
2026-02993 staff
2026-03999 staff
2026-04988 staff
2026-05983 staff
2026-06982 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to clinical staff: Full-time equivalent

1,313.3 FTE

1,313.3 FTE was reported for “Support to clinical staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to clinical staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,623.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,623.2 FTE
2025-071,429.7 FTE
2025-081,412.2 FTE
2025-091,381 FTE
2025-101,358.3 FTE
2025-111,352 FTE
2025-121,336.5 FTE
2026-011,326.9 FTE
2026-021,338 FTE
2026-031,325 FTE
2026-041,317.3 FTE
2026-051,326.8 FTE
2026-061,313.3 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to clinical staff: Headcount

1,503 staff

1,503 staff was reported for “Support to clinical staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to clinical staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,840. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,840 staff
2025-071,630 staff
2025-081,610 staff
2025-091,576 staff
2025-101,551 staff
2025-111,544 staff
2025-121,528 staff
2026-011,516 staff
2026-021,527 staff
2026-031,513 staff
2026-041,505 staff
2026-051,516 staff
2026-061,503 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent

986 FTE

986 FTE was reported for “Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,239.2. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,239.2 FTE
2025-071,090.8 FTE
2025-081,079.4 FTE
2025-091,054.6 FTE
2025-101,035.9 FTE
2025-111,032.7 FTE
2025-121,023.7 FTE
2026-011,008.8 FTE
2026-021,016.6 FTE
2026-031,002.9 FTE
2026-04997 FTE
2026-051,000.4 FTE
2026-06986 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Headcount

1,143 staff

1,143 staff was reported for “Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to doctors, nurses & midwives: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 01,423. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-061,423 staff
2025-071,260 staff
2025-081,246 staff
2025-091,218 staff
2025-101,198 staff
2025-111,193 staff
2025-121,184 staff
2026-011,167 staff
2026-021,175 staff
2026-031,159 staff
2026-041,152 staff
2026-051,157 staff
2026-061,143 staff

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to ST&T staff: Full-time equivalent

327.3 FTE

327.3 FTE was reported for “Support to ST&T staff: Full-time equivalent”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to ST&T staff: Full-time equivalent

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0383.9. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06383.9 FTE
2025-07338.9 FTE
2025-08332.8 FTE
2025-09326.4 FTE
2025-10322.4 FTE
2025-11319.3 FTE
2025-12312.8 FTE
2026-01318.1 FTE
2026-02321.4 FTE
2026-03322.2 FTE
2026-04320.3 FTE
2026-05326.4 FTE
2026-06327.3 FTE

June 2026 reporting organisation

Support to ST&T staff: Headcount

360 staff

360 staff was reported for “Support to ST&T staff: Headcount”. NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records.

Definition and source

Published measure: Support to ST&T staff: Headcount

NHS Hospital and Community Health Services workforce from payroll records. Excludes primary care and providers outside the collection. Headcount and full-time equivalent are distinct measures. Subgroups overlap with published totals and must not be added together. Organisation-wide staffing is not site staffing, an appointment count or a staffing-to-patient ratio. Changes can reflect transfers and coding. Source organisation: Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). Publisher quality notes (each retains its affected period): DQ200 (2017-01-01 00:00:00): Birmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) acquired Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust (RLU) to form Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3). DQ517 (2025-07-01 00:00:00): Transfer of 530 children and young people’s mental health staff and services from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust (RQ3) to Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (RXT).

Hospital and Community Health Services workforce · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-062026-06 · vertical scale 0417. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-06417 staff
2025-07370 staff
2025-08364 staff
2025-09358 staff
2025-10353 staff
2025-11351 staff
2025-12344 staff
2026-01349 staff
2026-02352 staff
2026-03354 staff
2026-04353 staff
2026-05359 staff
2026-06360 staff

For your decision These numbers do not show the staffing of a particular ward or appointment.

Infection surveillance: historical context

Historical reported infections, with surveillance definitions and reporting coverage.

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 84 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Community-onset, indeterminate-association

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset indeterminate association (COIA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust between 29 and 84 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases
Explore 34 additional measures

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is 3 days or more after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Total cases

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-052 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

C. difficile: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “C. difficile: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: C. difficile: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: The reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the 3 months prior to CDI case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Community-onset, community-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-122 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-042 reported cases
2026-052 reported cases
2026-062 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 03. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-123 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-092 reported cases
2025-102 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-121 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-062 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Total cases

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 06. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-083 reported cases
2025-093 reported cases
2025-104 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-126 reported cases
2026-015 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-043 reported cases
2026-052 reported cases
2026-064 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

E. coli: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “E. coli: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: E. coli: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the E. coli case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, community-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-112 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

2 reported cases

2 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 03. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-103 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-121 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-072 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Total cases

2 reported cases

2 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 04. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-104 reported cases
2025-114 reported cases
2025-121 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-022 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-072 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Klebsiella spp: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Klebsiella spp: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Klebsiella spp: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the Klebsiella spp. case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Community-onset, community-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Total cases

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MRSA: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MRSA: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MRSA: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'Don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the MRSA case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Community-onset, community-associated

2 reported cases

2 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date) Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-082 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-122 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-072 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

1 reported cases

1 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-011 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-071 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-121 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-031 reported cases
2026-041 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-061 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Total cases

3 reported cases

3 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 03. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-082 reported cases
2025-091 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-112 reported cases
2025-123 reported cases
2026-012 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-033 reported cases
2026-042 reported cases
2026-051 reported cases
2026-062 reported cases
2026-073 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

MSSA: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “MSSA: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: MSSA: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the MSSA case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, community-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, community-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, community-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset community-associated (COCA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient has not been discharged from the same reporting organisation in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Community-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Community-onset healthcare-associated (COHA): is not categorised HOHA and the patient was most recently discharged from the same reporting trust in the 28 days prior to the specimen date (where day one is the specimen date). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Hospital-onset, healthcare-associated

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Hospital-onset healthcare-associated (HOHA): specimen date is the same or more than 3 days after the current admission date (where day of admission is day one). Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-071 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-092 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: No information

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: No information”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: No information

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. No information: the reporting trust did not provide any answer for questions on prior admission. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Total cases

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Total cases”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Total cases

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 02. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-072 reported cases
2025-081 reported cases
2025-092 reported cases
2025-101 reported cases
2025-111 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-021 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

July 2026 NHS acute trust

Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Unknown

0 reported cases

0 reported cases was reported for “Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Unknown”. Historical laboratory-reported infection count.

Definition and source

Published measure: Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Unknown

Historical laboratory-reported infection count. The reporting trust processes the specimen and may not be where infection was acquired. UKHSA explicitly says these unadjusted counts are not a basis for comparisons between trusts or conclusions about infection-control effectiveness. Differences in population, case mix and hospital activity are not adjusted. Total and onset categories overlap; do not add them together. Extracted 17 August 2026; figures may be revised. Source reporting unit: BIRMINGHAM WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Unknown: the reporting trust answered 'don't know' to the question regarding previous discharge in the month prior to the P. aeruginosa case. Latest month signed off by trust: Yes.

Laboratory-reported healthcare-associated infections · Coverage and method

See how this has changed

2025-072026-07 · vertical scale 01. Gaps remain gaps.

Read the values by period
PeriodPublished value
2025-070 reported cases
2025-080 reported cases
2025-090 reported cases
2025-100 reported cases
2025-110 reported cases
2025-120 reported cases
2026-010 reported cases
2026-020 reported cases
2026-030 reported cases
2026-040 reported cases
2026-050 reported cases
2026-060 reported cases
2026-070 reported cases

For your decision Raw counts cannot rank hospitals with different sizes and patient groups.

National infection context and why counts cannot rank hospitals

Organisation environment: PLACE assessments

Environment assessments reported across an organisation, potentially covering several sites.

2025 reporting organisation

Cleanliness assessment

99.9%

99.9% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Cleanliness assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores. Publisher flags incomplete required ward or food assessments without a valid clinical or estate reason at one or more sites in this organisation.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment

99.5%

99.5% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores. Publisher flags incomplete required ward or food assessments without a valid clinical or estate reason at one or more sites in this organisation.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Dementia assessment

Not applicable

This measure does not apply to this record.

Definition and source

Published measure: Dementia assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores. Publisher flags incomplete required ward or food assessments without a valid clinical or estate reason at one or more sites in this organisation.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

Explore 5 additional measures

2025 reporting organisation

Disability assessment

97.2%

97.2% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Disability assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores. Publisher flags incomplete required ward or food assessments without a valid clinical or estate reason at one or more sites in this organisation.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Food assessment

94.5%

94.5% was reported for “Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Food assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores. Publisher flags incomplete required ward or food assessments without a valid clinical or estate reason at one or more sites in this organisation.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Organisation Food assessment

92.7%

92.7% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Organisation Food assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores. Publisher flags incomplete required ward or food assessments without a valid clinical or estate reason at one or more sites in this organisation.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment

94.7%

94.7% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores. Publisher flags incomplete required ward or food assessments without a valid clinical or estate reason at one or more sites in this organisation.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

2025 reporting organisation

Ward Food assessment

95.3%

95.3% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.

Definition and source

Published measure: Ward Food assessment

2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Organisation results are weighted by the beds in participating sites; they are not individual site scores. Publisher flags incomplete required ward or food assessments without a valid clinical or estate reason at one or more sites in this organisation.

PLACE: organisation environment assessments · Coverage and method

For your decision Confirm the arrangements at the exact building you will attend.

About this organisation

Recorded care types
NHS trusts, Provider groups
Local authority area
Birmingham
Funding information
NHS organisation — confirm the service’s funding
NHS organisation code
RQ3
CQC identifier
RQ3

CQC inspection evidence

Keep the publication date and assessed service in view. Ratings are reproduced as categories; they are not averaged into a score.

Ratings for specific services and population groups (18)
AssessmentRatingPublished
Child and adolescent mental health wards
Safe
Good11 September 2024
Child and adolescent mental health wards
Well-led
Good11 September 2024
Child and adolescent mental health wards
Overall
Good11 September 2024
Child and adolescent mental health wards
Effective
Good11 September 2024
Child and adolescent mental health wards
Caring
Good3 March 2023
Child and adolescent mental health wards
Responsive
Good3 March 2023
Mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety
Caring
Requires improvement3 March 2023
Mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety
Effective
Good3 March 2023
Mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety
Overall
Requires improvement3 March 2023
Mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety
Responsive
Good3 March 2023
Mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety
Safe
Requires improvement3 March 2023
Mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety
Well-led
Requires improvement3 March 2023
Specialist community mental health services for children and young people
Caring
Requires improvement15 December 2023
Specialist community mental health services for children and young people
Effective
Requires improvement15 December 2023
Specialist community mental health services for children and young people
Overall
Requires improvement15 December 2023
Specialist community mental health services for children and young people
Responsive
Requires improvement15 December 2023
Specialist community mental health services for children and young people
Safe
Requires improvement15 December 2023
Specialist community mental health services for children and young people
Well-led
Requires improvement15 December 2023

Service evidence

Connected organisations and services

Sources and coverage

Source changes may take time to appear here. Suggest a correction · Represent this provider