Hospitals · Liverpool
New Royal Liverpool University
Prescot Street, Liverpool, Merseyside, L7 8XP
MAKE YOUR VISIT EASIER
Contact, travel and your visit
Plan around the exact appointment location. The registered address can differ from the entrance or department you need.
Contact the service
01517062000Website and contact optionsNo verified public email address is included in this directory record. Use the service’s published contact route.
Opening and appointment times
Confirm today’s hours directly. Reception, telephone and individual clinic hours can differ.
Check current timesAccessibility and facilities
Check step-free access, accessible toilets, hearing support, interpreters and any help you need before travelling.
Ask about access arrangementsNearby places use the directory’s map reference point, which may be a postcode centre. Distances are approximate straight lines, not walking routes. Check the entrance, route and current arrangements.
Nearby transport stops
- Royal Liverpool University HospitalBus stop · Stop 1About 100 m in a straight line
- Royal Liverpool University HospitalBus stop · Stop 4About 200 m in a straight line
- Royal Liverpool University HospitalBus stop · Stop 3About 200 m in a straight line
- Liverpool Lime Street Low Level Rail StationRail stationAbout 900 m in a straight line
- Liverpool Lime Street Rail StationRail station entrance · EntranceAbout 1000 m in a straight line
Bus stops within 1 km; rail and other access points within 3 km. A listed stop does not confirm a current timetable.
DfT NaPTAN · downloaded 10 September 2026 · Open Government Licence.
Mapped parking nearby
- University of Liverpool VisitorsMapped car parkAbout 300 m in a straight line
- Paddington Village MSCPMapped car parkAbout 600 m in a straight line
- Lime Street Station short stayMapped car parkAbout 800 m in a straight line
These are nearby mapped car parks, not confirmed visitor parking for this service. Check access restrictions, charges, hours and Blue Badge arrangements with the operator.
© OpenStreetMap contributors · 9 September 2026 · ODbL. Data and coverage.
Published parking and facility figures
Historical hospital reporting. These figures do not establish current parking tariffs or available spaces.
2024/25 hospital site
Reported designated disabled parking spaces
53 spaces53 spaces was reported for “Reported designated disabled parking spaces”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Reported designated disabled parking spaces
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Parking totals include patients, visitors and staff. EV points can include fleet-only facilities. Leased/shared sites may report zero where no spaces are specifically allocated. Verify current visitor access, concessions and charges with the hospital.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Historical average hourly visitor parking charge
1.3 GBP per hour1.3 GBP per hour was reported for “Historical average hourly visitor parking charge”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Historical average hourly visitor parking charge
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Parking totals include patients, visitors and staff. EV points can include fleet-only facilities. Leased/shared sites may report zero where no spaces are specifically allocated. Verify current visitor access, concessions and charges with the hospital. Publisher average hourly charge is the price of a three-hour stay divided by three; aggregated sites can report the highest site charge. It is not today’s tariff.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
Explore 1 additional measures
2024/25 hospital site
Reported parking spaces, all users
1,489 spaces1,489 spaces was reported for “Reported parking spaces, all users”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Reported parking spaces, all users
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Parking totals include patients, visitors and staff. EV points can include fleet-only facilities. Leased/shared sites may report zero where no spaces are specifically allocated. Verify current visitor access, concessions and charges with the hospital.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
What to expect and prepare
General planning guidance; your service’s instructions take priority. NHS hospital visit guidance · Travel and access checklist.
Questions about visiting New Royal Liverpool University
What are the opening and visiting times?
Verified opening hours are not included in this directory record. Check the service’s website or call 01517062000 before travelling. Individual wards can have different visiting arrangements.
Do I need an appointment or referral?
Contact the service to confirm the booking or referral route for the exact care you need. Published activity and waiting figures do not show current appointment availability.
Can I park here, and is there accessible parking?
Check the service’s current parking instructions. Nearby map listings are separate from on-site visitor parking; neither a map entry nor historical parking figures confirm a space, price or Blue Badge concession today.
How can I arrange help with access or communication?
Contact the service before your visit and explain the help you need. Ask about the exact entrance, step-free routes, toilets, hearing support or interpretation; facilities are not inferred from the type of service.
What can I learn about New Royal Liverpool University?
The recorded overall CQC rating is “No Approved Rating”, dated 20 June 2025. Use the contact and visiting details above to check the service you need, then compare the dated evidence below.
UNDERSTAND YOUR OPTIONS
Care and access: the published picture
Start with the topics that matter to you. Each card explains one published measure; the date and reporting group show what it covers.
Inpatient experience at this hospital site
Patients’ survey responses about care at this hospital site.
2025 survey hospital site
Patients’ overall hospital experience
8.2 out of 108.2 out of 10 was reported for “Patients’ overall hospital experience”. Adult inpatients’ reported experience, scored out of 10 and adjusted by the publisher for age, sex and admission route. Higher scores mean more positive experiences; small differences do not establish a better hospital.
Definition and source
Published measure: Overall experience
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.6–9 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Being treated with respect and dignity
9.1 out of 109.1 out of 10 was reported for “Being treated with respect and dignity”. Adult inpatients’ reported experience of respect and dignity, scored out of 10. This describes the survey group and reporting unit shown, rather than every patient’s care.
Definition and source
Published measure: Respect and dignity
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.9–9.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?
8 out of 108 out of 10 was reported for “If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: If you brought medication with you to hospital, were you able to take it when you needed to?
Reported sample: 91.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.2–9.2 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.1. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 7.9 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.8 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 7.2 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.1 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8 out of 10 |
Explore 60 additional measures
2025 survey hospital site
Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?
8.2 out of 108.2 out of 10 was reported for “Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you get enough help from staff to eat your meals?
Reported sample: 68.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.1–9 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2024 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 9 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.2 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.
6 out of 106 out of 10 was reported for “Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you able to get hospital food outside of set mealtimes? This could include additional food if you missed set mealtimes due to operations/procedures or another reason.
Reported sample: 72.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.2–7.7 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2024 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–6.3. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 6.3 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 6 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?
9.3 out of 109.3 out of 10 was reported for “During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: During your time in hospital, did you get enough to drink?
Reported sample: 146.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 9–9.9 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.6. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 9 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.3 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9.6 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.3 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?
9 out of 109 out of 10 was reported for “When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: When you asked doctors questions, did you get answers you could understand?
Reported sample: 151.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.3–9.2 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.7 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 8.3 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.9 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?
9.2 out of 109.2 out of 10 was reported for “Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you have confidence and trust in the doctors treating you?
Reported sample: 157.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.6–9.6 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.2. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.2 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?
8.8 out of 108.8 out of 10 was reported for “When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: When doctors spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?
Reported sample: 152.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.2–9.4 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.2. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.7 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.2 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.8 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?
8.5 out of 108.5 out of 10 was reported for “When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: When you asked nurses questions, did you get answers you could understand?
Reported sample: 151.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.1–9.3 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.8. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.7 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 8.6 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.7 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.5 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?
9.1 out of 109.1 out of 10 was reported for “Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you have confidence and trust in the nurses treating you?
Reported sample: 157.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.5–9.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.1. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.9 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.1 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?
8.8 out of 108.8 out of 10 was reported for “When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: When nurses spoke about your care in front of you, were you included in the conversation?
Reported sample: 156.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.3–9.3 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.4 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.6 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.9 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.8 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?
8.3 out of 108.3 out of 10 was reported for “How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How did you feel about the length of time you were on the waiting list before your admission to hospital?
Reported sample: 46.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.7–8.2 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2024 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.5. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 8.5 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.3 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?
7.5 out of 107.5 out of 10 was reported for “In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: In your opinion, were there enough nurses on duty to care for you in hospital?
Reported sample: 156.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.9–8.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 7.3 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.1 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 7.4 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 7.5 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?
8.1 out of 108.1 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, were you told something by a member of staff that was different to what you had been told by another member of staff?
Reported sample: 146.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.1–8.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.3. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.3 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.4 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 7.5 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 7.9 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.1 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?
7.2 out of 107.2 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: To what extent did staff looking after you involve you in decisions about your care and treatment?
Reported sample: 153.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.6–7.9 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–7.7. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 7.4 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.4 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 7.5 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 7.7 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 7.2 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?
9.1 out of 109.1 out of 10 was reported for “How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How much information about your condition or treatment was given to you?
Reported sample: 157.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.4–9.4 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.3. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.5 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.9 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.3 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.1 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?
7.6 out of 107.6 out of 10 was reported for “Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you feel able to talk to members of hospital staff about your worries and fears?
Reported sample: 140.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.1–8.6 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.3. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.3 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.7 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 7.9 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.2 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 7.6 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?
9.4 out of 109.4 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you given enough privacy when being examined or treated?
Reported sample: 155.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 9.2–9.7 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.8. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 9 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 9.3 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.8 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9.5 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.4 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?
8.7 out of 108.7 out of 10 was reported for “Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Do you think the hospital staff did everything they could to help control your pain?
Reported sample: 133.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.3–9.4 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.9. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.9 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.9 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 8.3 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.7 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?
8.4 out of 108.4 out of 10 was reported for “Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you able to get a member of staff to help you when you needed attention?
Reported sample: 146.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.8–8.9 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.6. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.4 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.4 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 8.6 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.4 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.4 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)
6.8 out of 106.8 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Language needs (e.g. translation, braille)
Reported sample: 31.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: Somewhat worse.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.5–10 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Cultural needs (e.g. same gender staff)
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ).
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Religious needs (e.g. space to pray / meditate)
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ).
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)
8 out of 108 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Accessibility needs (e.g. mobility needs, room adaptations)
Reported sample: 50.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.2–9.7 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)
7.1 out of 107.1 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Dietary needs (e.g. medical, allergy, vegan)
Reported sample: 43.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.5–9.2 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)
6.9 out of 106.9 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about your care and treatment, did hospital staff take into account the following individual needs? Mental health needs (e.g. a quiet space, emotional support)
Reported sample: 39.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.6–8 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Before being admitted onto a virtual ward, did hospital staff give you information about the risks and benefits of continuing your treatment on a virtual ward?
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ).
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you given enough information about the care and treatment you would receive while on a virtual ward?
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ).
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?
6.7 out of 106.7 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: To what extent did staff involve you in decisions about leaving the hospital?
Reported sample: 154.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6–7.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–7.4. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 7.1 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.4 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 6.8 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 7 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 6.7 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?
6.2 out of 106.2 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: To what extent did hospital staff involve your family or carers in decisions about you leaving the hospital?
Reported sample: 108.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 4.9–6.7 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?
7.4 out of 107.4 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you would need any additional equipment in your home, or any changes to your home, after leaving the hospital?
Reported sample: 53.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7–9.6 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.7. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 7.7 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 8.4 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.7 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 7.4 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?
6.9 out of 106.9 out of 10 was reported for “Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you given enough notice about when you were going to leave hospital?
Reported sample: 156.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.2–7.8 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–7.3. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 7.3 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.1 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 6.7 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 7.2 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 6.9 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.
8.5 out of 108.5 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Before you left the hospital, were you given any information about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital? This includes any verbal, written or online information.
Reported sample: 145.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.2–8.8 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.5. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 7.8 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.5 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.5 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?
9.1 out of 109.1 out of 10 was reported for “To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: To what extent did you understand the information you were given about what you should or should not do after leaving the hospital?
Reported sample: 123.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.7–9.3 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.3. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 9.2 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 9.3 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.3 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.9 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.1 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?
6.4 out of 106.4 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Before you left the hospital, were your family or carers given the information they needed to care for you at home?
Reported sample: 90.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.2–7.4 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?
4.3 out of 104.3 out of 10 was reported for “Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Thinking about any medicine you were to take at home, were you given any of the following?
Reported sample: 128.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 3.6–5.4 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–4.5. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 4.4 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 4.1 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 4 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 4.5 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 4.3 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.
9 out of 109 out of 10 was reported for “How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How would you rate the quality of information you were given, while you were on the waiting list to be admitted to hospital? This includes verbal, written or online information.
Reported sample: 47.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: Much better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.9–8.4 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2024 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 8 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?
6.6 out of 106.6 out of 10 was reported for “Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Before you left the hospital, did you know what would happen next with your care?
Reported sample: 144.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.9–7.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–7. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 6.7 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 7 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 7 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 6.6 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?
7.7 out of 107.7 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did hospital staff tell you who to contact if you were worried about your condition or treatment after you left hospital?
Reported sample: 137.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.9–8.6 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–7.9. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 7.3 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.7 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 7.8 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 7.9 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 7.7 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.
8.3 out of 108.3 out of 10 was reported for “Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did hospital staff discuss with you whether you may need any further health or social care services after leaving the hospital? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.
Reported sample: 80.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.1–8.9 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.7. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.1 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 7.9 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 8.6 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.7 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.3 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.
5.9 out of 105.9 out of 10 was reported for “After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: After leaving the hospital, did you get enough support from health or social care services to help you recover or manage your condition? Please include any services from a physiotherapist, community nurse or GP, or assistance from social services or the voluntary sector.
Reported sample: 89.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.3–7.4 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2024 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–7.1. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2024 | 7.1 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 5.9 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?
8.9 out of 108.9 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Overall, did you feel you were treated with kindness and compassion while you were in the hospital?
Reported sample: 154.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.7–9.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2023 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.2. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 9.2 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.9 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?
9.1 out of 109.1 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Overall, did you feel you were treated with respect and dignity while you were in the hospital?
Reported sample: 154.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.9–9.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.4. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 9 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.4 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9.2 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.1 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.
8.2 out of 108.2 out of 10 was reported for “Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Overall, how was your experience while you were in the hospital? Please give your answer on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means you had a very poor experience and 10 means you had a very good experience.
Reported sample: 155.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.6–9 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.5. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.1 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 8.5 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.1 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.2 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?
6.1 out of 106.1 out of 10 was reported for “How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How long do you feel you had to wait to get to a bed on a ward, after you arrived at the hospital?
Reported sample: 154.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.4–8.6 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–6.1. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 5.9 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 5.9 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 5.6 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 6 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 6.1 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients
8.1 out of 108.1 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from other patients
Reported sample: 153.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: Better.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 5.4–8 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2023 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.8. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.3 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.1 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff
8.7 out of 108.7 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Noise from staff
Reported sample: 153.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.7–9.3 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2023 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.7. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 8.5 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.7 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.7 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting
8.5 out of 108.5 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Hospital lighting
Reported sample: 153.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.8–9.1 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2023 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.8. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 8.7 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.5 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature
9.1 out of 109.1 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? Room temperature
Reported sample: 153.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.6–9.7 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2023 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.4. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 9 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9.4 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.1 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping
4.8 out of 104.8 out of 10 was reported for “Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Were you ever prevented from sleeping at night by any of the following? I was not prevented from sleeping
Reported sample: 153.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 2.9–5.1 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2023 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–5. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 4.4 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 5 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 4.8 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?
9.2 out of 109.2 out of 10 was reported for “How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: How clean was the hospital room or ward that you were in?
Reported sample: 155.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.4–9.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–9.3. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.8 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 9.1 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 9.2 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 9.3 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 9.2 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?
8.5 out of 108.5 out of 10 was reported for “Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Did you get enough help from staff to wash or keep yourself clean?
Reported sample: 109.
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.4–9.1 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
See how this has changed
2021 → 2025 · vertical scale 0–8.5. Gaps remain gaps.
Read the values by period
| Period | Published value |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 8.2 out of 10 |
| 2022 | 8.4 out of 10 |
| 2023 | 8.2 out of 10 |
| 2024 | 8.3 out of 10 |
| 2025 | 8.5 out of 10 |
2025 survey hospital site
Admission to hospital
7.8 out of 107.8 out of 10 was reported for “Admission to hospital”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Admission to hospital
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.4–8.1 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Kindness and compassion
8.9 out of 108.9 out of 10 was reported for “Kindness and compassion”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Kindness and compassion
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.7–9.5 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
The hospital and ward
8.1 out of 108.1 out of 10 was reported for “The hospital and ward”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: The hospital and ward
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7–8.3 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Basic needs
8 out of 108 out of 10 was reported for “Basic needs”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Basic needs
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.3–8.8 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Doctors
9 out of 109 out of 10 was reported for “Doctors”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Doctors
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8.4–9.4 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Nurses
8.5 out of 108.5 out of 10 was reported for “Nurses”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Nurses
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 8–9.1 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Your care and treatment
8.3 out of 108.3 out of 10 was reported for “Your care and treatment”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Your care and treatment
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 7.9–8.8 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Individual needs
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Individual needs
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ).
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Virtual wards
Not reportedThere is no usable published value for this measure in the selected release.
Definition and source
Published measure: Virtual wards
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ).
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
2025 survey hospital site
Leaving hospital
7 out of 107 out of 10 was reported for “Leaving hospital”. Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units.
Definition and source
Published measure: Leaving hospital
Adults aged 16+ who stayed overnight, mainly discharged in November 2025; excludes maternity and psychiatric units. Scores standardised by admission route, age and sex. Higher scores indicate more positive reported experience. Published comparison bands concern most other reporting units, not a direct significance test between two selected providers. Do not rank providers or add up comparison bands. Unreported questions can reflect fewer than 30 responses; missing scores are not zero. Source reporting unit: Royal Liverpool University Hospital (REMRQ). Publisher comparison band: About the same.
Publisher 95% expected range (not a confidence interval around this score): 6.3–7.7 out of 10.
Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results · Coverage and method
Hospital environment: PLACE assessments
Assessments of the hospital environment, separate from clinical outcomes.
2025 hospital site
Cleanliness assessment
99.6%99.6% was reported for “Cleanliness assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Cleanliness assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Combined Food assessment
91.8%91.8% was reported for “Combined Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Combined Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
97.9%97.9% was reported for “Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Condition Appearance and Maintenance assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
Explore 5 additional measures
2025 hospital site
Dementia assessment
81%81% was reported for “Dementia assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Dementia assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Disability assessment
84%84% was reported for “Disability assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Disability assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Organisation Food assessment
96.2%96.2% was reported for “Organisation Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Organisation Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
88.7%88.7% was reported for “Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Privacy, Dignity and Wellbeing assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
2025 hospital site
Ward Food assessment
90.4%90.4% was reported for “Ward Food assessment”. 2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit.
Definition and source
Published measure: Ward Food assessment
2025 patient-led assessment of the non-clinical environment; not a clinical outcome or a current accessibility audit. Assessments involve staff and patient assessors and include judgement. Participation is voluntary and coverage differs. Check present-day facilities directly before travelling. Site assessment; do not substitute the parent organisation score.
PLACE: hospital environment assessments · Coverage and method
Hospital estate, parking and facilities
Reported estate and practical facilities information for this hospital site.
2024/25 hospital site
Reported designated disabled parking spaces
53 spaces53 spaces was reported for “Reported designated disabled parking spaces”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Reported designated disabled parking spaces
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Parking totals include patients, visitors and staff. EV points can include fleet-only facilities. Leased/shared sites may report zero where no spaces are specifically allocated. Verify current visitor access, concessions and charges with the hospital.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Reported electric vehicle charging points
9 points9 points was reported for “Reported electric vehicle charging points”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Reported electric vehicle charging points
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Parking totals include patients, visitors and staff. EV points can include fleet-only facilities. Leased/shared sites may report zero where no spaces are specifically allocated. Verify current visitor access, concessions and charges with the hospital.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Reported gross internal floor area
143,637 m²143,637 m² was reported for “Reported gross internal floor area”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Reported gross internal floor area
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
Explore 9 additional measures
2024/25 hospital site
Estimated high-risk maintenance backlog
500,000 GBP500,000 GBP was reported for “Estimated high-risk maintenance backlog”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Estimated high-risk maintenance backlog
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Estimated investment to restore the estate to the specified condition, grouped by risk. Definitions, coverage and valuation methods vary; this is not expenditure already incurred or a measure of individual patient risk.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Historical average hourly visitor parking charge
1.3 GBP per hour1.3 GBP per hour was reported for “Historical average hourly visitor parking charge”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Historical average hourly visitor parking charge
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Parking totals include patients, visitors and staff. EV points can include fleet-only facilities. Leased/shared sites may report zero where no spaces are specifically allocated. Verify current visitor access, concessions and charges with the hospital. Publisher average hourly charge is the price of a three-hour stay divided by three; aggregated sites can report the highest site charge. It is not today’s tariff.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Reported isolation rooms
28 rooms28 rooms was reported for “Reported isolation rooms”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Reported isolation rooms
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Estimated low-risk maintenance backlog
4,874,192 GBP4,874,192 GBP was reported for “Estimated low-risk maintenance backlog”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Estimated low-risk maintenance backlog
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Estimated investment to restore the estate to the specified condition, grouped by risk. Definitions, coverage and valuation methods vary; this is not expenditure already incurred or a measure of individual patient risk.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Estimated moderate-risk maintenance backlog
4,155,731 GBP4,155,731 GBP was reported for “Estimated moderate-risk maintenance backlog”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Estimated moderate-risk maintenance backlog
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Estimated investment to restore the estate to the specified condition, grouped by risk. Definitions, coverage and valuation methods vary; this is not expenditure already incurred or a measure of individual patient risk.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Reported parking spaces, all users
1,489 spaces1,489 spaces was reported for “Reported parking spaces, all users”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Reported parking spaces, all users
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Parking totals include patients, visitors and staff. EV points can include fleet-only facilities. Leased/shared sites may report zero where no spaces are specifically allocated. Verify current visitor access, concessions and charges with the hospital.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Estimated significant-risk maintenance backlog
2,413,705 GBP2,413,705 GBP was reported for “Estimated significant-risk maintenance backlog”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Estimated significant-risk maintenance backlog
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST. Estimated investment to restore the estate to the specified condition, grouped by risk. Definitions, coverage and valuation methods vary; this is not expenditure already incurred or a measure of individual patient risk.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Single patient bedrooms with en-suite facilities
509 rooms509 rooms was reported for “Single patient bedrooms with en-suite facilities”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Single patient bedrooms with en-suite facilities
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
2024/25 hospital site
Single patient bedrooms without en-suite facilities
112 rooms112 rooms was reported for “Single patient bedrooms without en-suite facilities”. Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025.
Definition and source
Published measure: Single patient bedrooms without en-suite facilities
Trust-submitted estate return for 1 April 2024–31 March 2025. Historic reporting, not live availability, a clinical quality score or a booking quote. Source unit: ROYAL LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL (REMRQ); LIVERPOOL UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST.
Estates Returns Information Collection · Coverage and method
About this service
- Recorded care types
- Hospitals
- Local authority area
- Liverpool
- Funding information
- NHS organisation — confirm the service’s funding
- Registered provider
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Telephone in source record
- 01517062000
- NHS organisation code
- REMRQ
- CQC identifier
- REMRQ
Registered specialisms
- Services for everyone
These are specialisms in the regulatory record. They do not confirm that a particular treatment, assessment or place is currently available.
CQC inspection evidence
Keep the publication date and assessed service in view. Ratings are reproduced as categories; they are not averaged into a score.
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| Safe | No Approved Rating | 20 June 2025 |
| Effective | No Approved Rating | 20 June 2025 |
| Caring | No Approved Rating | 20 June 2025 |
| Responsive | No Approved Rating | 20 June 2025 |
| Well-led | No Approved Rating | 20 June 2025 |
| Overall | No Approved Rating | 20 June 2025 |
Ratings for specific services and population groups (36)
| Assessment | Rating | Published |
|---|---|---|
| End of life care Caring | Outstanding · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| End of life care Responsive | Outstanding · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| End of life care Well-led | Outstanding · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| End of life care Overall | Outstanding · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Effective | Insufficient evidence to rate · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Urgent and emergency services Safe | Good | 23 April 2025 |
| Urgent and emergency services Responsive | Requires improvement | 23 April 2025 |
| Urgent and emergency services Well-led | Good | 23 April 2025 |
| Urgent and emergency services Overall | Good | 23 April 2025 |
| Critical care Responsive | Requires improvement · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Surgery Safe | Requires improvement | 26 October 2021 |
| Surgery Responsive | Requires improvement | 26 October 2021 |
| Surgery Well-led | Requires improvement | 26 October 2021 |
| Surgery Overall | Requires improvement | 26 October 2021 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Safe | Requires improvement | 20 June 2025 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Responsive | Good | 20 June 2025 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Well-led | Good | 20 June 2025 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Overall | Good | 20 June 2025 |
| Urgent and emergency services Effective | Good | 23 April 2025 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Safe | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Caring | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Responsive | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Well-led | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Outpatients and diagnostic imaging Overall | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Urgent and emergency services Caring | Good | 23 April 2025 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Caring | Good | 20 June 2025 |
| Medical care (including older people's care) Effective | Good | 20 June 2025 |
| Critical care Safe | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Critical care Effective | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Critical care Caring | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Critical care Well-led | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Critical care Overall | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| End of life care Safe | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| End of life care Effective | Good · inherited | 29 July 2016 |
| Surgery Effective | Good | 26 October 2021 |
| Surgery Caring | Good | 26 October 2021 |
Regulated activities
- Assessment or medical treatment for persons detained under the Mental Health Act 1983
- Diagnostic and screening procedures
- Family planning
- Management of supply of blood and blood derived products
- Surgical procedures
- Treatment of disease, disorder or injury
Connected organisations and services
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRegistered provider
Sources and coverage
- Care Quality Commission registerDirectory: 9 September 2026; detailed register: 1 September 2026 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
- Adult inpatient survey: hospital-site results2025 survey · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- PLACE: hospital environment assessments2025 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
- Estates Returns Information Collection2024/25 · Retrieved 10 September 2026
Joined using the official reporting organisation code. Measures keep their source reporting level.
Source changes may take time to appear here. Suggest a correction · Represent this provider
More options in Liverpool
Explore the areaAlder Hey Children's Hospital
Liverpool, L12 2AP
Caring for children (0 - 18yrs) · Caring for adults under 65 yrs · Learning disabilities
View service detailsBroadgreen Hospital
Liverpool, L14 3LB
Hospital
View service detailsLiverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
Liverpool, L14 3PE
Caring for children (0 - 18yrs) · Caring for adults under 65 yrs · Caring for adults over 65 yrs
View service detailsLiverpool Women's at Aintree
Liverpool, L9 7AL
Caring for children (0 - 18yrs) · Sensory impairments · Caring for adults under 65 yrs
View service details